REVIEW PAPER
Autonomy as a basic determinant of the quality of life in disorders of the musculoskeletal system
1
Institute of Applied Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
2
Stefan Żeromski Specialist Hospital, Krakow, Poland
Submission date: 2022-11-30
Final revision date: 2023-01-19
Acceptance date: 2023-04-19
Publication date: 2023-06-30
Medical Studies 2023;39(2):198-205
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this article is to draw attention to the basic factor determining a patient’s dignity and quality of life, which is the ability to function autonomously, maintaining self-reliance and independence. In disorders of the locomotor system, and orthopaedic surgeries, such as total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty, allow the patient – after the rehabilitation period – to carry out life tasks without the help of others. The article discusses ways of understanding patient autonomy as well as quality of life and the determinants of both. Then, it formulates premises for the treatment of orthopaedic patients that allows us to optimize their well-being, satisfaction with surgery, and full use of the resulting improvement in health. The basic assumptions that make up the model of the work of a multidisciplinary team in orthopaedic surgery departments has also been formulated.
REFERENCES (34)
1.
Gulla B, Izydorczyk B, Kubiak R. Godność i intymność pacjenta. Aspekty psychologiczne i prawne. RUJ. Kraków 2019.
2.
Arrieta Valero I. Autonomies in interaction: dimensions of patient autonomy and non-adherence to treatment. Front Psychol 2019; 10: 1857.
3.
Kroemeke A. Skala Postrzeganej Autonomii: struktura czynnikowa i właściwości psychometryczne polskiej adaptacji. Psychiatria Polska 2015; 49: 107-117.
4.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? J Pers 2006; 74: 1557-1585.
5.
Gajda M, Pac A, Gryglewska B, Gajda P, Różańska A, Wójkowska-Mach J. Patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty in poland based on national data – challenge for Healthcare in Aging Society. Healthcare 2021; 9: 924.
6.
Miettinen HJ, Mäkirinne-Kallio N, Kröger H, Miettinen SS. Health-related quality of life after hip and knee arthroplasty operations. Scand J Surg 2021; 110: 427-433.
7.
de Beer J, Petruccelli D, Adili A, Piccirillo L, Wismer D, Winemaker M. Patient perspective survey of total hip vs total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27: 865-9.e1-5.
8.
Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Widmer M, Maravic M, Gómez-Barrena E, de Pina Mde F, Manno V, Torre M, Walter WL, de Steiger R, Geesink RG, Peltola M, Röder C. International survey of primary and revision total knee replacement. Int Orthop 2011; 35: 1783-1789.
9.
World Health Organization. (1998). Programme on mental health: WHOQOL user manual, 2012 revision. World Health Organization; https://apps.who.int/iris/hand... 77932.
10.
Post MW. Definitions of quality of life: what has happened and how to move on. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2014; 20: 167-180.
11.
van Knippenberg FC, de Haes JC. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: psychometric properties of instruments. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41: 1043-1053.
13.
Emerson EB. Evaluating the impact of deinstitutionalization on the lives of mentally retarded people. Am J Ment Defic 1985; 90: 277-288.
14.
Gotay CC, Moore TD. Assessing quality of life in head and neck cancer. Qual Life Res 1992; 1: 5-17.
15.
Schipper H, Clinch JJ, Olweny CLM. Quality of life studies: definitions and conceptual issues. In: Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Spilker B (ed.). Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia 1996; 11-23.
16.
McCormick A. Quality of life. In Cerebral Palsy: A Multidisciplinary Approach. 2018. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67858-0_33.
17.
Busija LL, Osborne RH, Nilsdotter A, Buchbinder R, Roos EM. Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery. Health Quality of Life Outcomes 2008; 6: 55.
18.
Jansson KÅ, Granath F. Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) before and after orthopedic surgery. Acta Orthop 2011; 82: 82-89.
19.
Lips P, van Schoor NM. Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 447-455.
20.
Lijoi F, Bianconi M, Davoli ML. Orthopedic surgery. In: Perioperative Care of the Elderly: Clinical and Organizational Aspects. Bettelli G (ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017; 157-164.
21.
Vincent HK, Horodyski M, Vincent KR, Brisbane ST, Sadasivan KK. Psychological distress after orthopedic trauma: prevalence in patients and implications for rehabilitation. PMR 2015; 7: 978-989.
22.
Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess 1985; 49: 71-75.
23.
Juczyński Z. Narzędzia Pomiaru w Promocji Psychologii Zdrowia. Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego, Warszawa 2012.
24.
Hobfoll SE. Stres, kultura i społeczność. Psychologia i filozofia stresu. GWP, Gdańsk 2006.
25.
Hobfoll SE. Zachowanie zasobów. Nowa próba konceptualizacji stresu. Nowiny Psychologiczne 1989; 5-6, 24-48.
26.
Salmon P. Psychologia w medycynie. Wspomaga współpracę z pacjentem i proces leczenia. GWP, Gdańsk 2002.
27.
Ferri P, Muzzalupo J, Di Lorenzo R. Patients’ perception of dignity in an Italian general hospital: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15: 41.
28.
Rogmark C, Lynøe N. How to play the final chess match-or at least lose with dignity. Acta Orthop 2021; 92: 633-634.
29.
Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, Ed. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000.
30.
Dinh JV, Traylor AM, Kilcullen MP, Perez JA, Schweis- sing EJ, Venkatesh A, Salas E. Cross-disciplinary care: a systematic review on teamwork processes in health care. Small Group Research 2020; 51: 125-166.
31.
Seaman JB, Erlen JA. “Everyday ethics” in the care of hospitalized older adults. Orthop Nurs 2013; 32: 286-289.
32.
Ayers DC, Franklin PD, Ring DC. The role of emotional health in functional outcomes after orthopaedic surgery: extending the biopsychosocial model to orthopaedics: AOA critical issues. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95: e165.
33.
Fehon DC, Swanson A. Perioperative psychological interventions. In: Perioperative Psychiatry. Zimbrean P, Oldham M, Lee H (eds.). Springer, Cham 2019.
34.
Travers V. Burnout in orthopedic surgeons. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2020; 106 (1S): S7-S12.
| eISSN: | 2300-6722 |
| ISSN: | 1899-1874 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
