Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
ORIGINAL PAPER
Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical treatment using the one-level ACDF method based on changes in the parameters of the sagittal balance of the cervical spine
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, Regional Hospital, Kielce, Poland
 
2
Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Surgery and Peripheral Nerves, University Clinical Hospital Military Medical Academy – Central Veterans Hospital, Lodz, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2021-03-10
 
 
Final revision date: 2021-05-19
 
 
Acceptance date: 2021-07-23
 
 
Publication date: 2021-09-30
 
 
Medical Studies 2021;37(3):181-186
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Anterior cervical fixation is one of the most effective methods of treating cervical discopathy. The following parameters are distinguished to assess cervical sagittal balance: cervical lordosis angle, T1 slope, and sagittal vertical axis.
Aim of the research: To assess the impact of the increase in the cervical lordosis angle on the other parameters of sagittal balance and on the effects of surgical treatment.

Material and methods:
Thirty patients were qualified for surgical treatment with the method of a single-level ACDF. An X-ray examination was taken before and 3 months after surgery. The following parameters were analysed: T1 slope, sagittal vertical axis, and cervical lordosis angle. The perceived pain was assessed by analysing the results of the NDI questionnaire and the VAS scale.

Results:
After surgical treatment, the Cobb angle changed statistically significantly (p = 0.001), on average 11.79°. The SVA C2-7 distance did not change significantly (p = 0.697), with a mean of 22.82 mm after surgery. The value of the T1 slope angle increased to 27.38° (p < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in the NDI scale (p < 0.001) and in the VAS scale (p < 0.001), but no correlation with changes in the sagittal balance parameters was demonstrated.

Conclusions:
The change in cervical sagittal balance seems to be an important prognostic factor in the assessment of the effectiveness of surgical treatment. The individual parameters showed mutual dependencies. The correction of balance parameters after single-level ACDF stabilization does not significantly affect the result of surgical treatment (NDI, VAS). However, this issue requires further research.
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958; 40A: 607-624.
 
2.
Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, Kawahara N, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K. Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine 1993; 18: 2167-2173.
 
3.
Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 1298-1307.
 
4.
Gore DR, Sepic SB, Gardner GM. Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine 1986; 11: 521-524.
 
5.
Robinson RA, Walker AE, Ferlic DC, Wiecking DK. The results of anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine J Bone Joint Surg Am 1962; 44: 1569-1587.
 
6.
Shriver MF, Lewis DJ, Kshettry VR, Rosenbaum BP, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Pseudoarthrosis rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis. Spine J 2015; 15: 2016-2027.
 
7.
Roussouly P, Nnadi C. Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 1824-1836.
 
8.
McAviney J, Schulz D, Bock R, Harrison DE, Holland B. Determining the relationship between cervical lordosis and neck complaints. J Manip Physiol Ther 2005; 28: 187-193.
 
9.
Iyer S, Lenke LG, Nemani VM, Albert TJ, Sides BA, Metz LN, Cunningham ME, Kim H. Variations in sagittal alignment parameters based on age: a prospective study of asymptomatic volunteers using full-body radiographs. Spine 2016; 41: 1826-1836.
 
10.
Tamai K, Buser Z, Paholpak P, Sessumpun K, Nakamura H, Wang JC. Can C7 slope substitute the T1 slope? An analysis using cervical radiographs and kinematic MRIs. Spine 2018; 43: 520-525.
 
11.
Park JH, Cho CB, Song JH, Kim SW, Ha Y, Oh JK. T1 slope and cervical sagittal alignment on cervical CT radiographs of asymptomatic persons. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2013; 53: 356-359.
 
12.
Sun J, Zhao HW, Wang JJ, Xun L, Fu NX, Huang H. Diagnostic value of T1 slope in degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Med Sci Monit 2018; 24: 791-796.
 
13.
Ling FP, Chevillotte T, Leglise A, Thompson W, Bouthors C, Le Huec JC. Which parameters are relevant in sagittal balance analysis of the cervical spine? A literature review. Eur Spine J 2018; 27: 8-15.
 
14.
Lin T, Wang Z, Chen G, Liu W. Is cervical sagittal balance related to the progression of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy? World Neurosurg 2020; 137: 52-67.
 
15.
Villavicencio AT, Babuska JM, Ashton A, Busch E, Roeca C, Nelson EL, Mason A, Burneikiene S. Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study evaluating the correlation of clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment. Neurosurgery 2011; 68: 1309-1316.
 
16.
Jun HS, Kim JH, Ahn JH, Chang IB, Song JH, Kim TH, Park MS, Kim YC, Kim SW, Oh JK. T1 slope and degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis. Spine 2015; 40: 220-226.
 
17.
Xu Y, Liu S, Wang F, Wu X. Cervical sagittal parameters were closely related to Neck Disability Index score after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15: 325.
 
18.
Faldini C, Chehrassan M, Miscione MT, Acri F, d’Amato M, Pungetti C, Luciani D, Giannini S. Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion using PEEK anatomical cervical cage and allograft bone. J Orthop Traumatol 2011; 12: 201-205.
 
eISSN:2300-6722
ISSN:1899-1874
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top