ORIGINAL PAPER
Experience of deceased donor kidney transplantation in Brest region
More details
Hide details
Submission date: 2015-10-07
Final revision date: 2015-12-15
Acceptance date: 2015-12-16
Publication date: 2016-01-11
Medical Studies 2015;31(4):257-261
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Renal transplantation has progressively increased, and it is the best management of end-stage renal disease.
Aim of the research: To evaluate the outcome of renal transplantation from deceased donors to adults living in a region with a population of about one and a half million.
Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of the outcomes of 126 recipients of allografts in the period 2011–2014 was performed. The mean age of the recipients was 44.5 ±13.4 years; 71 were male and 55 were female. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess the graft and recipient survival rates.
Results: The overall mortality rate in our study was 4.7% (6 patients), and the mortality of patients with a functioning kidney graft was 3.9% (5 patients). All of them died due to multiple organ failure caused by septic complications of different aetiologies. The data of in our study show that 1-year and 3-year cumulative patient survival after transplantation was 96% and 93.5%, respectively, and the survival rate of kidney grafts was 93% and 68%, respectively. Mean time spent on the renal transplant waiting list had been 31.6 ±7.9 years before the start of the Regional Department of Transplantation, and that was 21.4 ±10.3 (1–141) months in 2014.
Conclusions: Three-years of transplant activity in the Brest region resulted in a significant increase in the availability of deceased donor transplantations since every third of the patients with chronic renal failure had kidney allograft transplantation. The 3-year patient survival after transplantation was over 90% owing to up-to-date immunosuppressive regimens and management of postoperative complications.
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Marcickiewicz I, Głuszek S. Knowledge concerning organ transplantation among inhabitants of the Kielce Region. Studia Medyczne 2014; 30: 173-9.
2.
Mehta TR, Shah VR, Butala BP, et al. Intercity deceased donor renal transplantation: a single-center experience from a developing country. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2013; 24: 1280-4.
3.
Young B, Gill J, Huang E, et al. Living donor kidney versus simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant in type I diabetics: an analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4: 845-52.
4.
Manara AR, Murphy PG, O’Callaghan. Donation after circulatory death. G Br J Anaesth 2012; 108 Suppl. 1: i108-21.
5.
Serur D, Saal S, Wang J, et al. Deceased-donor kidney transplantation: improvement in long-term survival. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26: 317-24.
6.
Quiroga I, McShane P, Koo DD, et al. Major effects of delayed graft function and cold ischemia time on renal allograft survival. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21: 1689-96.
7.
Sert I, Colak H, Tugmen C, et al. The effect of cold ischemia time on delayed graft function and acute rejection in kidney transplantation. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2014; 25: 960-6.
8.
Nakhjavani M, Ghaemi F, Ravaghi H, et al. Short-term survival in renal transplantation from brain-death donors: focusing on recipients with diabetes background. Urol J 2014; 11: 1474-7.
9.
Slagt IK, Ijzermans JN, Visser LJ, et al. Independent risk factors for urological complications after deceased donor kidney transplantation. PLoS One 2014; 9: e91211.
10.
Lee JR, Bang H, Dadhania D, et al. Independent risk factors for urinary tract infection and for subsequent bacteremia or acute cellular rejection: a single center report of 1166 kidney allograft recipients. Transplantation 2013; 96: 732-8.
11.
Mouloudi E, Massa E, Georgiadou E, et al. Course and outcome of renal transplant recipients admitted to the intensive care unit: a 20-year study. Transplantation Proceedings 2012; 44: 2718-20.
12.
Weng SF, Chu CC, Chien CC, et al. Renal transplantation: relationship between hospital/surgeon volume and postoperative severe sepsis/graft-failure: a nationwide population-based study. Int J Med Sci 2014; 11: 918-24.