Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
REVIEW PAPER
From the best results of medical research to therapy involving the context of an individual patient
 
More details
Hide details
 
Submission date: 2014-09-02
 
 
Final revision date: 2014-12-04
 
 
Acceptance date: 2014-12-05
 
 
Publication date: 2015-01-11
 
 
Medical Studies 2014;30(4):280-284
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Contextualisation is the process of identifying specific factors of a patient’s life situation, which is focused on individualised care. In the light of reference books, contextualisation is an integral part of therapy with an active participation of the patient and/or his/her carers. Among many factors that constitute the functioning of a person, family and socio-material situation, access to professional health care, and the ability to exercise self-care are major contextual factors of the patient’s health situation. The purpose of this article is to draw attention to the fact that the limiting oneself exclusively to algorithms as procedures based on the best evidence (best evidence medical research – BEMR) may raise the specific danger of underestimating the variability of individual responses of the human body under the influence of factors forming a personal context. The phenomenon of contextualisation in the treatment of an individual patient is still not adequately disseminated, although it is an important element in the decision-making process, with proven impact on the efficiency and quality of care and satisfaction of a patient.
REFERENCES (22)
1.

Weiner SJ. Contextualizing medical decisions to individualize care: lessons from the qualitative sciences. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19: 281-5.
 
2.

Schatz E, Schatz IJ. Medicine and political science: parallel lessons in methodological excess. PS: Political Science & Politics 2003; 36: 417-22.
 
3.

Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t [Editorial]. BMJ 1996; 312: 71-2.
 
4.

Weiner SJ. From research evidence to context: the challenge of individualizing care [Editorial]. ACP J Club 2004; 141: A11-2.
 
5.

Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (eds.) To err is human: building a safer health system. DC: National Academies Pr; Washington, 2000.
 
6.

Weiner SJ, Schwartz A, Weaver F, et al. Contextual errors and failures in individualizing patient care. A multicenter study. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153: 69-75.
 
7.

Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. DC: National Academy Press. Washington 2001.
 
8.

Falzer PR, Garman MD. A conditional model of evidencebased decision making. J Eval Clin Pract 2009; 15: 1142-51.
 
9.

Falzer PR, Garman DM. Contextual decision making and the implementation of clinical guidelines: an example from mental health. Acad Med 2010; 85: 548-55.
 
10.

Weiner SJ. Contextual error. In: Encyclopedia of medical decision making. Kattan M (ed.). Sage, London 2008; 198-202.
 
11.

Breslin M, Mullan RJ, Montori VM. The design of a decision aid about diabetes medications for use during the consultation with patients with type 2 diabetes. Patient Educ Couns 2008; 73: 465-72.
 
12.

Stange KC. A science of connectedness [Editorial]. Ann Fam Med 2009; 7: 387-95.
 
13.

Kim TW, Samet JH, Cheng DM, et al. Primary care quality and addiction severity: a prospective cohort study. Health Serv Res 2007; 42: 755-72.
 
14.

Weiner SJ, Schwartz A, Yudkowsky R, et al. Evaluating physician performance at individualizing care: a pilot study tracking contextual errors in medical decision making. Med Decis Making 2007; 27: 726-34.
 
15.

Paasche-Orlow MK, Parker RM, Gazmararian JA, et al. The prevalence of limited health literacy. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20: 175-84.
 
16.

Konarzewski K. Jak uprawiać badania oświatowe. Metodologia praktyczna. WSiP, Warszawa 2000; 25-40.
 
17.

Haynes RB, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH. Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. Evid Based Med 2002; 7: 36-8.
 
18.

Guyatt G, Montori V, Devereaux PJ, et al. Patients at the center: in our practice, and in our lives. Evid Based Med 2004; 9: 6-7.
 
19.

Kosztołowicz M, Szerla M, Domański M. Propozycja konstrukcji języka komunikacji lekarz-pacjent z uwzględnieniem bólu i osobowości pacjenta. In: Ból i cierpienie. Makiełło-Jarży G, Gajda Z (eds.). Krakowskie Towarzystwo Edukacyjne – Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, Krakow 2008; 113-34.
 
20.

Szerla M, Ortenburger D, Domański M, Tarnopolski A. Selected factors influencing the relationship between the physician and the patient with chronic pain. In: The multidisciplinary approach to health and desease. Selected papers. Janowski K, Steuden S (eds.). CPP Scientific Press, Lublin 2011; 140-8.
 
21.

Szerla M, Kosztołowicz M. Aplikacja wspólnego sensu w wykrywaniu osobowościowego aspektu bólu. In: Ból i cierpienie. Makiełło-Jarży G, Gajda Z (eds.). Krakowskie Towarzystwo Edukacyjne – Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, Kraków 2009; 17-9.
 
22.

Jan Paweł II, Fides et ratio. Wydawnictwo Diecezji Tarnowskiej Byblos, Tarnów 1998.
 
eISSN:2300-6722
ISSN:1899-1874
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top