ORIGINAL PAPER
Imaging-based assessment of rectus abdominis muscle thickness in an adult population: evaluating possible anthropometric relationships
More details
Hide details
Submission date: 2014-06-28
Final revision date: 2014-08-07
Acceptance date: 2014-08-08
Publication date: 2014-09-19
Medical Studies 2014;30(3):180-187
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Very little attention has been paid to muscle architecture in the Sub-Saharan African environment, and the rectus abdominis muscle, being a stabilising agent in the trunk, should not be left out. Considering the incidence of trunk musculoskeletal discomfort, it is necessary to assess the rectus abdominis muscle.
Aim of the research: To assess the thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle in an apparently healthy adult population using ultrasound and to evaluate its possible relationship with important anthropometric variables.
Material and methods: A total of 120 healthy subjects made up of 60 males and 60 females, who gave their written consent, were recruited for this study. B-mode ultrasound was used to assess the rectus abdominis muscle. Anthropometric variables were also assessed.
Results: The results show that the rectus abdominis thickness (RAT) was 14.68 ±2.92 mm and 14.37 ±2.74 mm for the right (RRAT) and left (LRAT) sides, respectively. The males had significantly thicker muscles than the females (p = 0.004) and the RAT correlated positively with age, weight, height, body mass index, body surface area, waist circumference, and conicity index.
Conclusions: These results show robust myoanthropometric relationships that will assist surgeons in reconstructive procedures involving the muscle. They will also serve as a guidepost in the biomechanical assessment of the muscle in lifting sports for an African population, in the study of muscle flaps, and in the general evaluation of trunk mass.
REFERENCES (46)
1.
Fukunaga T, Kantakami Y, Kuno S, et al. Muscle architecture and function in humans. J Biomech 1997; 30: 457-63.
2.
Aagaard P, Andersen JL, Dyhre-Poulsen P, et al. A mechanism for increased contractile strength of human pinnate muscle in response to strength training: changes in muscle architecture. J Physiol 2001; 534: 613-23.
3.
Lieber RL, Friden J. Clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 383: 140-51.
4.
Fukunaga T, Ichinose Y, Ito M, et al. Determination of fascicle length and pennation in a contracting human muscle in vivo. J Appl Physiol 1997; 82: 354-8.
5.
Maganaris CN, Baltzopoulos V, Sargeant AJ. In vivo measurement of triceps surae complex architecture in man: implication of muscle function. J Physiol 1998; 2: 603-14.
6.
Rutherford OM, Jones DA. Measurement of fibre pennation using ultrasound in the human quadriceps in vivo. Eur J Appl Physiol 1992; 65: 433-7.
7.
Egwu O, Njoku C, Ukoha U, et al. Calf muscle (triceps surae complex) thickness in an adult Nigerian population: an imaging based normographic study. Maced J Med Sci 2013; 6: 146-52.
8.
Heckmatt JZ, Pier N. Dubowitz V. Assessment of quadriceps femoris muscle atrophy and hypertrophy in neuromuscular disease in children. J Clin Ultrasound 1988; 16: 177-81.
9.
Miyatani M, Kanehisa H, Ito M, et al. The accuracy of volume estimates using ultrasound muscle thickness measurements in different muscle groups. Euro J Appl Physiology 2004; 91: 264-72.
10.
Lee CD, Song Y, Peltier AC, et al. Muscle ultrasound quantifies the rate of reduction of muscle thickness in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 2010; 42: 814-9.
11.
Moreau NG, Simpson KN, Teefey SA, et al. Muscle architecture predicts maximum strength and is related to activity levels in cerebral palsy. Phys Ther 2010; 90: 1619-30.
12.
Teyhen DS, Miltenberger CE, Deiters HM, et al. The use of ultrasound imaging of the abdominal drawing-in maneuver in subjects with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005; 35: 346-55.
13.
Hicks GE, Fritz JM, Delitto A, et al. Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1753-62.
14.
Saal JA. Dynamic muscular stabilization in the nonoperative treatment of lumbar pain syndromes. Orthop Rev 1990; 19: 691-700.
15.
O’Sullivan PB, Twomey LT, Allison GT. Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis of spondylolisthesis. Spine 1997; 22: 2959-67.
16.
Young WA, Wright JK. Scrotal reconstruction with a rectus abdominis muscle flap. Br J Plastic Surg 1988; 41: 190-3.
17.
Robbins TH. Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction. Aust N Z J Surg 1979; 49: 527-30.
18.
Arnez ZM, Smith RW, Eder E, et al. Breast reconstruction by the free lower transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. Br J Plast Surg 1988; 41: 500-5.
19.
Fernando B, Muszynski C, Mustoe T. Closure of a sternal defect with the rectus abdominis muscle after sacrifice of both internal mammary arteries. Ann Plastic Surg 1988; 21: 468-71.
20.
Urken ML, Turk JB, Weinberg H, et al. The rectus abdominis free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117: 1031.
21.
Carey JN, Sheckter CC, Watt AJ, et al. Intra-abdominal pedicled rectus abdominis muscle flap for treatment of high-output enterocutaneous fistulae: case reports and review of literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66: 1145-8.
22.
Jinming Z, Xiaoxuan C, Jieren P, et al. The rectus abdominis musculoperitoneal (RAMP) flap for the reconstruction of complicated pharyngoesophageal defects. Br J Plastic Surg 2005; 58: 608-13.
23.
Press BHJ, Chiu DT, Cunningham BL. The rectus abdominis muscle in difficult problems of hand soft tissue reconstruction. Br J Plastic Surg 1990; 43: 419-25.
24.
Bruce RG, El-Galley RE, Galloway N. Use of rectus abdominis muscle flap for the treatment of complex and refractory urethrovaginal fistulas. J Urology 2000; 163: 1212-5.
25.
Atan A, Tuncel A, Aslan Y. Treatment of refractory urethrovaginal fistula using rectus abdominis muscle flap in a six-year-old girl. Urology 2007; 69: 384-11.
26.
Galli A, Raposio E, Santi P. Reconstruction of full-thickness defects of the thoracic wall by myocutaneous flap transfer: latissimus dorsi compared with transverse rectus abdominis. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1995; 29: 39-43.
27.
Reath DB, Taylor JW. The segmental rectus abdominis free flap for ankle and foot reconstruction. Plastic Reconstruct Surg 1991; 88: 824-8.
28.
Ikezoe T, Mori N, Nakamura M, et al. Effects of age and inactivity due to prolonged bed rest on atrophy of trunk muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012; 112: 43-8.
29.
Kanehisa H, Miyatani M, Azuma K, et al. Influences of age and sex on abdominal muscle and subcutaneous fat thickness. Eur J Appl Phyiol 2004; 91: 534-7.
30.
Rankin G, Stokes M, Newham DJ. Abdominal muscle size and symmetry in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve 2006; 34: 320-6.
31.
Ainscough-Potts AM, Morrissey MC, Critchley D. The reponse of the transverse abdominis and internal obique muscles to different postures. Man Ther 2006; 11: 54-60.
32.
Ikezoe T, Mori N, Nakamura M, et al. Age-related muscle atrophy in the lower extremities and daily physical activity in elderly women. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2011; 53: e153-7.
33.
Balius R, Pedret C, Galilea P, et al. Ultrasound assessmentof asymmetric hypertrophy of rectus abdominis muscle and prevalence of associated injury in professional tennis players. Skeletal Radiol 2012; 41: 1575-81.
34.
Ononogbu IC. Food biochemistry and Nutrition Gico Tech. Nigeria Ltd. Publishers Nsukka Nigeria 1997; 20-70.
35.
Coldron Y, Stokes MJ, Newham DJ, et al. Postpartum characteristics of rectus abdominis on ultrasound imaging. Manual Therapy 2008; 13: 112-21.
36.
Rostami M, Yekta AHA, Noormohammadpour P, et al. Relations between lateral abdominal muscles thickness, body mass index, waist circumference and skin fold thickness. Acta Med Iran 2013; 51: 101-6.
37.
Campbell IT, Watt T, Withers D, et al. Muscle thickness, measured with ultrasound, may be an indicator of lean tissue wasting in multiple organ failure in the presence of edema. Am J Clin Nutr 1995; 62: 533-9.
38.
Narici MV. Human skeletal muscle architecture studied in vivo by non-invasive imaging techniques: functional significance and applications. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1999; 9: 97-103.
39.
De Troyer A, Estenne M, Ninane V, et al. Transversus abdominis muscle function in humans. J Appl Physiol 1990; 68: 1010-6.
40.
Misuri G, Colagrande S, Gorini M, et al. In vivo ultrasound assessment of respiratory function of abdominal muscles in normal subjects. Eur Respi J 1997; 10: 2861-7.
41.
Taylor RW, Jones IE, Williams SM, Goulding A. Evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and the conicity index as screening tools for high trunk fat mass, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in children aged 3–19 y. Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 72: 490-5.
42.
du Dubois D, du Dubois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be know. Nutrition 1989; 5: 303-11.
43.
Kim J, Lim H, Lee SI, et al. Thickness of rectus abdominis muscle and abdominal subcutaneous fat tissue in adult women: correlation with age, pregnancy, laparotomy, and body mass index. Arch Plastic Surgery 2012; 39: 528-33.
44.
Phillips TJ, Stella DL, Rozen WM. Abdominis wall CT angiography a detailed account of a newly established preoperative imaging technique. Radiology 2008; 249: 32-44.
45.
Suh IS, Bang RS, Park KN. Analysis of subcutaneous tissue thickness of the flap donor sites by ultrasography. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 19: 534-7.
46.
Njoku CO. Songraphic assessment of android adipose tissue thickness in Ebonyi population: A correlation with anthropometric variables. M.Sc. Dissertation, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria 2010.