ORIGINAL PAPER
In silico finite element modelling (FEM) in the realm of femur trauma
1
Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology, and Sports Medicine, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warsaw, Poland
2
Faculty of Physics and Engineering Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
3
Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Havana, Cuba
4
Center for Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation and Reeducation (Ce.Fi.R.R.), “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
5
Institute of Health Sciences, Opole University, Opole, Poland
Submission date: 2024-12-15
Acceptance date: 2025-04-28
Publication date: 2025-12-15
Corresponding author
Mieczysław Pokorski
Mieczysław Pokorski Institute of Health Sciences Opole University, Opole, Poland
Mieczysław Pokorski Institute of Health Sciences Opole University, Opole, Poland
Medical Studies 2025;41(4):390-394
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Pertrochanteric femur fractures are bone traumas that are difficult to manage, with a substantial rate of union failure. Excessive stress exerted on the fragmented bones can cause nonunion, which requires salvage surgery. Bone stress as the underlying mechanism of nonunion is as yet unassessable, which makes it difficult to choose the method of restabilisation.
Aim of the research:
We adopted an innovative method of in silico finite element modelling (FEM) to retrospectively simulate the pattern of stabiliser-bone stress distribution changes in proximal femur fractures, which may underlie the lack of osteosynthesis necessitating salvage surgery.
Material and methods:
FEM concerned proximal femur A2 and A3 fractures in elderly patients who required restabilisation due to a failure to achieve union. The modelling was entirely virtual, with no patient involvement at any stage, and based on X-ray bone contour projections. We chose the non-standard ZESPOL method for restabilisation, in which the stabilising system is mounted about 10 mm apart from the bone surface.
Results:
FEM showed the presence of substantial stabiliser-bone stress before achieving the union. ZESPOL stabilisation equalised and reduced stress, ending up in a full union.
Conclusions:
An outstanding difference in stress distribution between the conditions of nonunion and union after salvage surgery reaffirms the conceptual basis for the stress-induced role in union failure. ZESPOL is viable stabilisation in difficult-to-treat conditions of pertrochanteric fracture nonunion. FEM can help in decision-making concerning the type of surgical repair needed for the optimal disburdening of compressive stress to accelerate osteosynthesis.
Pertrochanteric femur fractures are bone traumas that are difficult to manage, with a substantial rate of union failure. Excessive stress exerted on the fragmented bones can cause nonunion, which requires salvage surgery. Bone stress as the underlying mechanism of nonunion is as yet unassessable, which makes it difficult to choose the method of restabilisation.
Aim of the research:
We adopted an innovative method of in silico finite element modelling (FEM) to retrospectively simulate the pattern of stabiliser-bone stress distribution changes in proximal femur fractures, which may underlie the lack of osteosynthesis necessitating salvage surgery.
Material and methods:
FEM concerned proximal femur A2 and A3 fractures in elderly patients who required restabilisation due to a failure to achieve union. The modelling was entirely virtual, with no patient involvement at any stage, and based on X-ray bone contour projections. We chose the non-standard ZESPOL method for restabilisation, in which the stabilising system is mounted about 10 mm apart from the bone surface.
Results:
FEM showed the presence of substantial stabiliser-bone stress before achieving the union. ZESPOL stabilisation equalised and reduced stress, ending up in a full union.
Conclusions:
An outstanding difference in stress distribution between the conditions of nonunion and union after salvage surgery reaffirms the conceptual basis for the stress-induced role in union failure. ZESPOL is viable stabilisation in difficult-to-treat conditions of pertrochanteric fracture nonunion. FEM can help in decision-making concerning the type of surgical repair needed for the optimal disburdening of compressive stress to accelerate osteosynthesis.
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Orimo H, Yaegashi Y, Hosoi T, Fukushima Y, Onoda T, Hashimoto T, Sakata K. Hip fracture incidence in Japan: estimates of new patients in 2012 and 25-year trends. Osteoporos Int. 2016; 27(5): 1777-1784.
2.
Dziadosz D. Considerations with failed intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femur fractures: how to treat, revise, and replace. J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29 (Suppl 4): S17-S21.
3.
Xu Q, Lai J, Zhang F, Xu Y, Zhu F, Lin J, Zhao M, Ye J, Wen L. Poor outcomes for osteoporotic patients undergoing conversion total hip arthroplasty following prior failed dynamic hip screw fixation: a nationwide retrospective cohort study. J Int Med Res. 2019; 47(4): 1544-1554.
4.
Mills LA, Simpson AH. The relative incidence of fracture non-union in the Scottish population (5.17 million): a 5-year epidemiological study. BMJ Open. 2013; 3(2): e002276.
5.
Nicholson JA, Makaram N, Simpson A, Keating JF. Fracture nonunion in long bones: a literature review of risk factors and surgical management. Injury. 2021; 52 Suppl 2: S3-S11.
6.
Gawronska K, Lorkowski J. Functional symmetry after surgical treatment of pertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. Symmetry. 2022; 14(2): 393.
7.
Hodel S, Beeres F, Babst R, Link BC. Complications following proximal femoral locking compression plating in unstable proximal femur fractures: medium-term follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017; 27(8): 1117-1124.
8.
Shah M, Kapoor C, Soni R, Patwa J, Golwala P. Evaluation of outcome of proximal femur locking compression plate (PFLCP) in unstable proximal femur fractures. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017; 8(4): 308-312.
9.
Karampinas PK, Kollias G, Vlamis J, Papadelis EA, Pneumaticos SG. Salvage of failed hip osteosynthesis for fractures with modular hip prosthesis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015; 25(6): 1039-1045.
10.
Bhowmick K, Matthai T, Boopalan PRJ, Jepegnanam TS. Decision making in the management of malunion and nonunion of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip. Hip Int. 2020; 30(6): 793-798.
11.
Hopf T, Osthege S. Interfragmental compression of the ZESPOL osteosynthesis system. Experimental biomechanical studies. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1987; 125(5): 546-552.
12.
Hopf T, Mittelmeier W, Mittelmeier H. Spongiosa formation in plate osteosynthesis--a comparative animal experiment study of current and auto-compression plates using the ZESPOL principle. Aktuelle Traumatol. 1989; 19(2): 65-72.
13.
Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. Fracture and dislocation calssification compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2018; 32 Suppl 1: S1-S170.
14.
VanCourt RB, Byron SE, Ali SJ, Caldwell BD. Fracture mechanics. A comparison study of torsional stress on bone. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2000; 90(4): 167-174.
15.
Granowski R. The clinical use of the ZESPOL osteosynthesis. I. The ZESPOL osteosynthesis of shaft and distal end of thigh bone. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 1999; 1(1): 39-43.
16.
Lorkowski J, Mrzyglod MW, Pokorski M. In silico modeling of stress distribution in the diseased ankle joint. J Clin Med. 2024; 13(18): 5453..
17.
Mathur VP, Atif M, Duggal I, Tewari N, Duggal R, Chawla A. Reporting guidelines for in-silico studies using finite element analysis in medicine (RIFEM). Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022; 216: 106675.
18.
Lorkowski J, Pokorski M. In silico finite element modeling of stress distribution in osteosynthesis after pertrochanteric fractures. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(7): 1885.
19.
Lorkowski J, Wilk R, Pokorski M. In silico evaluation of treatment of periprosthetic fractures in elderly patients after hip arthroplasty. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021; 1289: 115-123.
| eISSN: | 2300-6722 |
| ISSN: | 1899-1874 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
