Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
ORIGINAL PAPER
Influence of method of venous blood collection on the blood cell count determination result
 
 
More details
Hide details
 
Publication date: 2013-10-25
 
 
Medical Studies 2013;29(3):251-254
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The preanalytical phase of laboratory testing, including collecting of the material, is one of the most important factors affecting the quality of the results of analyzes.
Aim of the research: To evaluate the influence of the method of collecting venous blood on the result of blood cell count determination.
Material and methods: Venous blood of 20 healthy people was collected into tubes with K2EDTA using two types of blood collection system: an open blood collection system (consisting of a syringe and needle) and a vacuum blood collection system (consisting of a vacuum tube for blood collection and matching needle).
Results: Statistical analysis of the results showed that the method of blood venous collection influenced the result of some parameters of blood cell count determination, such as red blood cell count, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, hematocrit and platelet count, but did not influence mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration. These differences are clinically relevant because they do not exceed 5% of the value.
Conclusions: Results of blood morphology appears to depend on the method of sample collection. The observed differences are not clinically significant, because they do not exceed 5%.
REFERENCES (14)
1.

Bomski H. Basic laboratory tests in hematology. PZWL, Warsaw 1995.
 
2.

Ślusarska B, Zarzycka D, Zahradniczek K. Fundamentals of nursing. Vol. II. Selected nursing interventions. Czelej, Lublin 2008.
 
3.

Dukwicz A. Technical aspect of the collection of research material – blood. Gab Lek 2000; 1: 51–55.
 
4.

Naskalski J. The quality of the sample and the risk of medical errors. Bad Diag 2007; 13: 25–28.
 
5.

Annex 1 to the Regulation of the Minister of Health of 21 January 2009 on “Quality Standards of medical diagnostic laboratory activities, including medical immunology, assess their quality and value of diagnostic and laboratory result interpretation and authentication research”.
 
6.

Recomendations of the International Council for Standarization in hematology for ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid anticogulation of blood for blood cell counting and sizing. Am J Clin Pathol 1993; 100: 371–372.
 
7.

Mariańska B, Fabijańska-Mitek J, Windyga J. Laboratory tests in hematology. PZWL, Warsaw 2003.
 
8.

Dyrka A. Serum and plasma as a material for laboratory testing. Bad Diag 2007; 13: 65–69.
 
9.

Guder WG, Narayanan S, Wisser H, et at. Samples: from the patient to the laboratory. 3rd ed. Willey-VCH 2003; 53–55.
 
10.

Sears D, Charache S, Perlstein M. Electronic blood cell counters. Faulty calibration due to type and amount of anticoagulant in collection tubes. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1985; 109: 247–249.
 
11.

Kuśnierz-Cabala B. Practical problems hematocrit test. Bad Diag 2008; 14: 77–79.
 
12.

www.vetlab.pl (30.09.2009).
 
13.

Jaźwińska-Kuliś J. Preanalytical sources of uncertainty in the laboratory – part I. Lab Med 2008; 4: 40–42.
 
14.

http://www.dd-lab.pl/ /technologie-2.php (21.09.2009).
 
eISSN:2300-6722
ISSN:1899-1874
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top