ORIGINAL PAPER
Medical simulation as perceived by students: where are we, and where are we heading?
More details
Hide details
1
Interdisciplinary Student Science Club of Medical Simulation, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland
2
Student Science Club of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
3
Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland; Interdisciplinary Student Science Club of Medical Simulation Academy of Applied Medical and Social Sciences in Elblag, Poland
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2025-05-13
Acceptance date: 2025-06-24
Publication date: 2026-06-29
Corresponding author
Martyna Pożarowszczyk
Student Science Club
of Interdisciplinary Medicine
Collegium Medicum
University of Warmia and Mazury
Olsztyn, Poland
Medical Studies 2026;42(2):242-248
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Educational methods involving medical simulation are widespread and standard tools, appreciated by both medical students and educators.
Aim of the research:
To investigate the opinions of students of selected medical study programs concerning medical simulation (MS)-based classes.
Material and methods:
A survey questionnaire was conducted on 254 students of medicine, nursing, and paramedicine. The questionnaire consisted of 10 closed questions and one open-ended question, in which respondents could suggest changes to improve the quality of MS-based classes.
Results:
Most respondents (87%) felt that MS-based classes facilitated learning and the acquisition of practical skills. For nearly 83% of respondents, the number of MS-based classes was insufficient. According to 85% of students, MS-based classes increased their involvement in classes. Most students (92%) appreciated ‘debriefing’ as a component of the simulation but believed that this element of MS needed to be improved to achieve particular learning outcomes. Next, the results were analysed by comparing them in groups according to the medical study programme. The main differences concerned interdisciplinarity, number of hours of MS-based classes, and the role of simulation in medical education. Answers given to the open-ended question highlighted the need to extend theoretical knowledge as part of preparation for MS-based classes, to thoroughly explain technical aspects of available equipment, to increase teachers’ preparation given the specificity of the classes, and to master ‘debriefing’ techniques.
Conclusions:
Students value MS-based classes. However, their quality should be improved to optimally capitalise on the benefits of this method and to achieve expected learning outcomes.
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Czekajło M, Dąbrowski M, Dąbrowska A, Torres K. Medical simulation as a professional tool which affect the safety of the patient used in the learning process. Pol Merk Lek. 2015; 38(228): 360-363.
2.
Al-Elq AH. Simulation-based medical teaching and learning. J Fam Commun Med. 2010; 17(1): 35-40.
3.
Berman NB, Durning SJ, Fischer MR, Huwendliek S, Triola MM. The role for virtual patients in the future of medical education. Acad Med. 2016; 91: 1217-1222.
4.
Jones F, Passos-Neto CE, Braguiroli OFM. Simulation in medical education: brief history and methodology. Principles Pract Clin Research J. 2015; 1(2): 56-63.
5.
Nowakowski M. Medical simulation in Poland – the current status and prospects for development [in Polish]. Ogol Prz Med. 2018; 1-2: 13-18.
6.
So HY, Chen PP, Wong GKC, Chan TTN. Simulation in medical education. J R Coll Phys. 2019; 49(1): 52-57.
7.
Skrzypek A, Stalmach-Przygoda A, Dębicka-Dąbrowska D, Kocurek A, Szopa M, Górski S, Szeliga M, Małecki Ł, Grodecka A, Cebula G, Nowakowski M. Selected didactic methods used in education of medical students at the Department of Medical Eudcation of Jagiellonian University Medical College. What’s new in medical didactics? General Profes Educ. 2018; 1: 26-32.
8.
Vessey JA, Huss K. Using standardized patients in advanced practice nursing education. J Prof Nurs. 2002; 18(1): 29-35.
9.
Page-Cutrara K. Prebriefing in nursing simulation: a concept analysis. Clin Simul Nurs. 2015; 11(7): 335-340.
10.
Parry M, Fey MK. Simulation in advanced practice nursing. Clin Simul Nurs. 2019; 26: 1-2.
11.
Phillips KE, Roberto A, Salmon S, Smalley V. Nursing student interprofessional simulation increases empathy and improves attitudes on poverty. J Com Health Nurs. 2020; 37(1): 19-25..
12.
Sullivan GM, Artino AR Jr. Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ. 2013; 5(4): 541-542.
13.
Januszko-Giergielewicz B, Wójcik-Kula A, Perliński J. Dynamic changes in teaching and learning methods in the field of study of medicine – evolution, not revolution [in Polish]. Acta Elbing. 2023; 50(1): 77-82.
14.
Yu JH, Chang HJ, Kim SS, Park JE, Chung WY, Lee SK, Kim M, Lee JH, Jung YJ. Effects of high-fidelity simulation education on medical students’ anxiety and confidence. PLoS One. 2021; 16(5): e0251078.
15.
Zafar M. Medical students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of integrated clinical skills sessions using different simulation adjuncts. Adv Psychiol Edu. 2016; 40(4): 514-521.
16.
Torres K, Kański A. Simulation in medical education [in Polish]. Grafpol, Lublin 2018.
17.
Kim J, Park JH, Shin S. Effectiveness of simulation-based nursing education depending on fidelity: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2016; 16: 152.
18.
Skov RAC, Lawaetz J, Konge L, Westerlin L. Simulation-based education of endovascular scrub nurses reduces stress and improves team performance. J Surg Res. 2022; 280: 209-217.
19.
Jones V, McClunie-Trust P, Macdiarmid R, Turner R, Shannon K, Winnington R, Brown A, Dewar J, Jarden R. Education pathways for graduate entry registered nurses to transition to advanced practice roles: a realist review. Nurse Educ Today. 2024; 133: 106032.
20.
Murphy M, Curtis K, McCloughen A. What is the impact of multidisciplinary team simulation training on team performance and efficiency of patient care? An integrative review. Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2016; 19(1): 44-53.
21.
Abulebda K, Auerbach M, Limaiem F. Debriefing techniques utilized in medical simulation. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls. 2022.
22.
Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg SB. Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. Med Teacher. 2013; 35(10): e1511-e1530.
23.
Tomaszewska K, Majchrowicz B, Trojnar P, Boratyn B. Medical simulation as a method of practical training in the opinion of nursing students. Nurs 21st Century. 2023; 22(2): 85-92.
24.
El Naggar MA, Almaeen AH. Student’s perception towards medical-simulation training as a method for clinical teaching. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020; 70(4): 618-623.
25.
Salik I, Paige JT. Debriefing the Interprofessional Team in Medical Education. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls. 2024.