ORIGINAL PAPER
Position of the pelvis, lower extremities load and the arch
of the feet in young adults who are physically active
More details
Hide details
Submission date: 2013-07-21
Final revision date: 2013-08-14
Acceptance date: 2013-08-14
Publication date: 2013-10-25
Medical Studies 2013;29(3):225-229
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Body posture is an individual motion habit. It is variable and depends on the gender, age, structure of the body but also on mental and physical state. Although it is difficult to formulate a universal definition of correct body posture, the opinion that its elementary feature is symmetry is beyond any doubt. Such symmetry is related to the position of particular anatomical points and effects of static and dynamic forces.
Aim of the research: To assess the relations between the pelvis position in the frontal plane, the static load on the lower limbs and architecture of the feet. The following features were analysed in a group of young, healthy and particularly physically active women and men: the frequency of asymmetry related to pelvis position, the load on the lower limbs related to body weight and foot architecture.
Material and methods: The study group consisted of 100 students of physical education. To assess the position of the pelvis a palpable-visual method was used. Clarke’s method was applied to characterize the foot architecture determined by the position of standing with one leg on the CQ Elektronik podoscope. The static load on the lower limbs was assessed using the stabilographic platform EMILDUE from Technomex.
Results: Collected data and observations show frequent asymmetric changes of pelvis position in the frontal plane and incorrect balance of the body in the standing position. The change of static load on the lower limbs influences the longitudinal architecture of the feet and this influence is statistically significant. Increased asymmetry of the pelvis in the frontal plane is related to profound disorder of body balance.
Conclusions: Asymmetric position of the pelvis is associated with asymmetric arching of the feet and asymmetric body weight distribution. Full symmetric position of the pelvis is rare even among young people who are physically active.
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Barczyk K, Skolimowski T, Hawryluk A. Kształtowanie się asymetrii tułowia u dzieci w młodszym wieku szkolnym. Fizjoter Pol 2004; 3: 203–208.
2.
Winter DA. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait Posture 1995; 3: 193–214.
3.
Day JW, Smidt GL, Lehmann T. Effect of pelvic tilt on standing posture. Phys Ther 1984; 64: 510–516.
4.
Kantor E, Poupard L, Le Bozec S, Bouisset S. Does body stability depend on postural chain mobility or stability area? Neurosci Lett 2001; 308: 128–132.
5.
Wojtanowski W. Terapia manualna w korekcji wad postawy. PWSZ, Tarnów 2008.
6.
Demczuk E, Anwajler J, Wojna D. Zrównoważenie ciała w płaszczyźnie czołowej a cechy morfologiczne stóp u dzieci w wieku 7–8 lat. Fizjoterapia 1993; 1: 33.
7.
Kasperczyk T. Wady postawy ciała – diagnostyka i leczenie. Kasper, Kraków 2004.
8.
Al-Eisa E, Egan D, Deluzio K, Wassersug R. Effects of pelvic asymmetry and low back pain on trunk kinematics during sitting: a comparison with standing. Spine 2006; 31: 135–143.
9.
Bibrowicz K, Skolimowski T. Występowanie zaburzeń symetrii postawy w płaszczyźnie czołowej u dzieci od 6 do 9 roku życia. Fizjoterapia 1995; 3: 26–29.
10.
Horst R. Motorisches Strategietraining und PNF. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 2005.
11.
Nissinen M, Heliövaara M, Seitsamo J, Poussa M. Trunk asymmetry, posture, growth, and risk of scoliosis: a three-year follow-up of Finnish prepubertal school children. Spine 1993; 18: 8–13.
12.
Al-Eisa E, Egan D, Deluzio K, Wassersug R. Effects of pelvic skeletal asymmetry on trunk movement: three-dimensional analysis in healthy individuals versus patients with mechanical low back pain. Spine 2006; 31: 71–79.
13.
Graf K, Bronowski A, Napiórkowska M, et al. Ustawienie miednicy u dziewcząt zdrowych i z bocznym skrzywieniem kręgosłupa. Fizjoter Pol 2008; 8: 371–377.
14.
Walaszek R, Kasperczyk T, Czapla D. Ocena funkcjonalna stawów obręczy biodrowej u dzieci ze skoliozami i zdrowych. Wych Fiz Zdrow 2006; 3: 12–17.
15.
Stępień A, Seyfried A, Krawczyk M, et al. Wpływ deformacji kręgosłupa na sposób obciążania stóp w czasie chodu u osób ze skoliozą idiopatyczną. Post Rehab 2007; 2: 13–20.
16.
Zieliński JR, Ilnicka L, Pacelt B, et al. Próba morfo-funkcjonalnej oceny stopy człowieka. Wych Fiz Sport 1994; 4: 83–92.
17.
Evans AM. The flat-footed child-to treat or not to treat what is the clinician to do? J Am Med Assoc 2008; 98: 386–393.
18.
Menz HB, Morris ME, Lord SR. Foot and ankle characteristics associated with impaired balance and functional ability in older people. J Geront Series A 2005; 60: 1546–1552.
19.
Gołębiewska J, Pacelt B, Zieliński JR. Wpływ obciążeń statycznych na wybrane parametry budowy stopy. Wych Fiz Sport 2007; 51: 287–291.
20.
Riddiford-Harland DL, Steele JR, Sturlien LH. Does obesity influence foot structure in prepubescent children. Int J Obes 2000; 24: 541–544.
21.
Kwolek A, Korb D, Majka M. Rehabilitacja w zespołach bólowych dolnego odcinka kręgosłupa – zasady postępowania. Post Rehab 2004; 14: 27–31.