ORIGINAL PAPER
Root canal morphology of maxillary second premolars among the Kurdish population in Iraqi Kurdistan: a retrospective CBCT assessment
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Duhok, Iraqi Kurdistan Region, Iraq Head of the Department: Assist. Prof. Bahar Selivany
Submission date: 2021-12-03
Final revision date: 2022-06-24
Acceptance date: 2022-06-26
Publication date: 2022-06-30
Medical Studies 2022;38(2):152-156
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Aim of the research:
To explore the morphology of the root canal systems of permanent maxillary second premolars among the Iraqi Kurdistan population.
Material and methods:
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan images were accessed from a documented database of 300 patients (165 male, 135 female) from Iraqi Kurdistan regions, who had had oral and maxillofacial examinations. The age of the patients ranged from 18 to 50 years, and scanned images were evaluated by 2 independent dental radiologists who assessed the axial, sagittal, and coronal sections to check the number of orifices, roots, root canals, and foramina. Canal configuration was classified using the Vertucci classification to evaluate and analyse the root canal morphology.
Results:
One orifice was the most prevalent number of orifices in 3 governorates in Iraqi Kurdistan (86.33%). The teeth with one canal (67.0%) and one root (89.33%) were the most prevalent. One foramen was the most prevalent number of a foramen in 3 governorates and Iraqi Kurdistan (86.7%) followed by 2 foramina (13.3%). The first canal type was the most prevalent in the Kurdish population with permanent maximally second premolars (69.0%) followed by class V (12.3%) and class II (11%). Classes VI (0.7%) and III (2%) were rare canal types in this region. Class VII canal type was not found in the population in the Iraqi Kurdistan region.
Conclusions:
One orifice, one foramen, one canal, and one root with type I were the most prevalent morphology of the maxillary second premolar in Iraqi Kurdish populations
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. The root and root canal morphology of the human mandibular first premolar: a literature review. J Endod 2007; 33: 509-516.
2.
Baruwa AO, Martins JN, Meirinhos J, Pereira B, Gouveia J, Quaresma SA, Monroe A, Ginjeira A. The influence of missed canals on the prevalence of periapical lesions in endodontically treated teeth: a cross-sectional study. J Endod 2020; 46: 34-39.e31.
3.
Awawdeh L, Al Qudah A. Root form and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 240-248.
4.
Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; 58: 589-599.
5.
Awawdeh L, Abdullah H, Al-Qudah A. Root form and canal morphology of Jordanian maxillary first premolars. J Endod 2008; 34: 956-961.
6.
Atieh MA. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Saudi population. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008; 9: 46-53.
7.
Blašković-Šubat V, Smojver I, Maričić B, Šutalo J. A computerized method for the evaluation of root canal morphology. Int Endod J 1995; 28: 290-296.
8.
Omer O, Al Shalabi R, Jennings M, Glennon J, Claffey N. A comparison between clearing and radiographic techniques in the study of the root-canal anatomy of maxillary first and second molars. Int Endod J 2004; 37: 291-296.
9.
Patel S, Brown J, Pimentel T, Kelly R, Abella F, Durack C. Cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics – a review of the literature. Int Endod J 2019; 52: 1138-1152.
10.
Patel S, Dawood A, Whaites E, Pitt Ford T. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 447-462.
11.
Senan EM, Alhadainy HA, Genaid TM, Madfa AA. Root form and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars of a Yemeni population. BMC Oral Health 2018; 18: 94.
12.
Saeed SHM, Saeed DH, Ibrahim AR, Abdullah AO. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of root and root canal system of perma-nent maxillary first and second molars in a sample of Iraqi Kurdistan patients. J Kurdistan Board Med Spec 2019; 5(2)..
13.
Alqedairi A, Alfawaz H, Al-Dahman Y, Alnassar F, Al-Jeba- ly A, Alsubait S. Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary premolars in a Saudi population. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018: 8170620.
14.
Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics 2005; 10: 3-29.
15.
Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 33: 101-110.
16.
Gordon MPJ, Chandler NP. Electronic apex locators. Int Endod J 2004; 37: 425-437.
17.
Raj UJ, Mylswamy S. Root canal morphology of maxillary second premolars in an Indian population. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13: 148-151.