Should journal editors be held responsible for fake peer reviews?
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area, Shenyang, China
Submission date: 2016-08-26
Acceptance date: 2016-11-09
Publication date: 2016-12-28
Medical Studies 2016;32(4):315
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Dear Editor,
We are submitting the enclosed manuscript entitled "Should the journal editors be responsible for fake peer review?" for your consideration for publication as a “Letter to the Editor” in Medical Studies.
We guarantee that the data mentioned in the article is completely accurate and the manuscript is original research that has not been published or is not under consideration elsewhere. All authors have made an intellectual contribution to the manuscript and approved the submission.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely yours,
Xingshun Qi M.D.
Department of Gastroenterology,
General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area,
No. 83 Wenhua Road, Shenyang, 110840 China.
Tel: 86-24-28897603; Fax: 86-24-28851113;
Email: xingshunqi@126.com
REFERENCES (5)
1.
Ferguson C, Marcus A, Oransky I. Publishing: the peer-review scam. Nature 2014; 515: 480-2.
2.
Haug CJ. Peer-review Fraud-Hacking the scientific publication process. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2393-5.
3.
China’s medical research integrity questioned. Lancet 2015; 385: 1365.
4.
Moylan E. Inappropriate manipulation of peer review. In: BioMed Central 2015.
5.
Reiss CS. Ethical concerns. DNA Cell Biol 2015.