ORIGINAL PAPER
The effect of collecting umbilical cord blood during caesarean
section on perioperative blood loss and incidence of complications
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
2
Student’s Scientific Society “Eskulap”, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
Submission date: 2021-12-03
Final revision date: 2022-03-18
Acceptance date: 2022-03-24
Publication date: 2022-03-31
Medical Studies 2022;38(1):54-58
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Collecting cord blood (CB) for banking is a common practice in obstetrics. There are many studies in the literature assessing the use of the obtained stem cells in medicine, however, there are few examining the interference of the collection procedure with the delivery mechanism and maternal blood loss.
Aim of the research:
To assess the effect of this procedure on perioperative maternal blood loss during caesarean section (CS).
Material and methods:
It was a retrospective, observational study. It included 238 women in whom a CS was performed and umbilical cord blood (CB) was collected using the in utero method. The control group consisted of 1106 patients who underwent CS without CB collection.
Results:
We observed statistically significant lower values of hemoglobin (Hb) (11.5 g/dl vs. 11.7 g/dl, p = 0.04) and hematocrit (Hct) (33.7% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.03) in the study group compared with controls after the surgery. In the study group, we also observed a greater median decrease in the concentration of Hb (1.1 g/dl vs. 0.8 g/dl, p < 0.001) and Hct (3.05% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001). Platelet levels did not change. We recorded no difference in the incidence rates of postpartum anemia (Hb < 10 g/dl) and severe postpartum anemia (Hb < 7 g/dl).
Conclusions:
In utero CB collection during CS is associated with a statistically significant increase in perioperative blood loss. The difference is small and of no clinical significance in the healthy population of young patients undergoing CS.
REFERENCES (10)
1.
ACOG Committee Opinion No. Umbilical cord blood banking. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133: e249-e253.
2.
Mlodawski J, Mlodawska M, Przybysz N, Bielak A, Detka K, Pasiarski M, Rokita W. Collection of umbilical cord blood and the risk of complications in postpartum women after natural labour in the context of the possibility of umbilical cord stem cells usage. Ginekol Pol 2021; 92: 205-209.
3.
Amat L, Sabrià J, Martínez E, Rodríguez NL, Querol S, Lailla JM. Cord blood collection for banking and the risk of maternal hemorrhage. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90: 1043-1045.
4.
Holmgren G, Sjöholm L, Stark M. The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 615-621.
5.
Milman N. Postpartum anemia II: prevention and treatment. Ann Hematol 2012; 91: 143-154.
6.
Marcon AR, Murdoch B, Caulfield T. Peddling promise? An analysis of private umbilical cord blood banking company websites in Canada. Cell Tissue Bank 2021; 22: 609-622.
7.
Organization. World Health. WHO. Guideline Delayed umbilical cord for improved maternal and infant health and nutrition outcomes. 2014.
8.
Mlodawski J, Mlodawska M, Pazera G, Michalski W, Domanski T, Dolecka-Slusarczyk M, Gluszek S, Rokita W. Cerebral palsy and obstetric-neonatological interventions. Ginekol Pol 2019; 90: 722-727.
9.
Lasky LC, Lane TA, Miller JP, Lindgren B, Patterson HA. In utero or ex utero cord blood collection: which is better? Transfusion 2002; 42: 1261-1267.
10.
Mostert K, Halpenny M, Bartlett D, Campbell T, Dib- din N, Petraszko T, Allan D, Elmoazzen H. Comparison of ex utero and in utero cord blood collection methods: Canadian Blood Services’ Cord Blood Bank. Stem Cells Transl Med 2018; 7 (Suppl 1): S26.