Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
ORIGINAL PAPER
The influence of willpower and implementation of intention on subjective evaluation of the level of achieving personal goals
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Social Work, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
 
2
Department of Psychology of Individual Differences, Warsaw Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland
 
3
Department of Health Psychology and Psychiatry, Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2019-05-19
 
 
Final revision date: 2019-08-16
 
 
Acceptance date: 2019-11-08
 
 
Publication date: 2019-12-30
 
 
Medical Studies 2019;35(4):255-263
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
An important factor leading to the achievement of planned goals is the power of will and implementation of intentions. This is explained by the concepts of Julius Kuhl and Peter Gollwizer.

Aim of the research:
To replicate the experiment of R. Kadzikowska-Wrzosek, referring to the impact of willpower and implementation of intentions on the subjective assessment of the extent to which personal goals have been achieved.

Material and methods:
The study included 61 first-year students of the master’s degree physiotherapy course of the Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce. First, the respondents completed the Julius Kuhl’s Action Control Scale (ACS-90), adapted in Polish by Magdalena Marszał-Wiśniewska. The AOD/SOD and the AOF/SOF subscales were used to divide the subjects into two groups: state orientation and action orientation. Respondents were assigned to one of the two groups: Implementation (where the goal was planned to be pursued) and No Implementation.

Results:
It was confirmed that the subjective evaluation of goal implementation progress is explained bywillpower and is not significantly explained by the implementation of intention. Moreover, an interacting effect of the implementation of intentions and willpower in decision-making situations (AOD) was obtained, consisting of the fact that in the no-implementation group, willpower was not important for evaluating the achievement of the objective, whereas in the implementation group, higher willpower was conducive to a higher assessment of achieving the objective. These results are not fully consistent with the outcome of R. Kadzikowska-Wrzosek’s experiment.

Conclusions:
Based on the qualitative analysis of the goals, it can be concluded that with regard to the implementation affecting or not affecting the goal achievement evaluation, the study result was related to the specific nature of the goals, which were highly similar in persons implementing and not implementing those goals.
REFERENCES (29)
1.
Tomaszewski T. Psychologia. PWN, Warsaw 1977.
 
2.
Rokeach M. The Nature and Human Values. The Free Preiss. Adivision of Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York 1973.
 
3.
Kuhl J. Volitional mediators of cognition – behavior consistency. In: Action control. From cognition to behavior. Kuhl J, Beckman J (ed.). Springer, Berlin 1985; 101-128.
 
4.
Zaleski Z. Psychologia zachowań celowych. PWN, Warsaw 1991.
 
5.
Łukaszewski W, Marszał-Wiśniewska M. Wytrwałość w działaniu. Wyznaczniki sytuacyjne i osobowościowe. Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk 2006.
 
6.
Bandura A. Self-regulation of motivation and action through internal standards and goal systems. In: Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology. Pervin LA (ed.). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New York 1989; 19-85.
 
7.
Emmons RA. The Psychology of Ultimate Concerns. Guilford, New York 1998.
 
8.
Carver CS. Regulation of action and affect. In: Handbook of Self-regulation. Research, Theory, and Applications. Baumeister RF, Vohs KD (eds.). Guilford, New York 2004; 13-39.
 
9.
Mądrzycki T. Osobowość jako system tworzący i realizujący plany życiowe. Wydawnictwo UG, Gdańsk 2002.
 
10.
Baumaeister RF, Tierney J. Siła woli. Odkryjmy na nowo to, co w człowieku najpotężniejsze. Media Rodzina, Poznań 2013.
 
11.
Gollwitzer PM. The volitional benefits of planning. In: The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior. Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA (eds.). Guilford, New York 1996; 287-312.
 
12.
Gollwitzer PM, Fujita K, Oettingen G. Planning and the implementation of goals. In: Handbook of Self-regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications. Baumeister RF, Vohs KD (eds). The Guilford Press, New York 2004; 211-228.
 
13.
Kadzikowska-Wrzosek R. Autonomia, samoregulacja i kontrola działania. Smak Słowa, Sopot 2013.
 
14.
Maruszewski T, Doliński D, Łukaszewski W, Marszał-Wiśniewska M. Emocje i motywacja. In: Psychologia Akademicka. Strelau J, Doliński D (eds). PWN, Warsaw 2015; 514-648.
 
15.
Gollwitzer PM, Heckhausen H, Ratajczak H. From weighing to willing: approaching a change decision through pre- or postdecisional mentation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decission Process 1990; 45: 45-65.
 
16.
Orbell S, Hodgkins S, Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and the theory of planned behavior. http://people.umass.edu/aizen/....
 
17.
Kuhl J, Goschke T. A theory of action control. Mental subsystems, modes of control, and volitional conflict-resolution strategies. In: Volition and Personality. Action Versus State Organization. Kuhl J, Beckman J (eds). Hogrefe and Huber Publishers, Gottingen 1994; 93-124.
 
18.
Kuhl J. A theory of action and state orientation. In: Volition and Personality. Action Versus State Organization. Kuhl J, Beckman J (eds). Hogrefe and Huber Publishers, Gottingen 1994; 9-46.
 
19.
Marszał-Wiśniewska M. Siła woli a temperament. Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii PAN, Warsaw 1999.
 
20.
Kadzikowska-Wrzosek R. Subiektywna ocena w realizacji celów. Wpływ implementacji intencji oraz różnic indywidualnych w sposobie formułowania celów i w sile woli. Psychologia Społeczna 2011; 1: 49-66.
 
21.
Baumann N, Kuhl J. How to resist temptation: the effects of external control versus autonomy. J Personality 2005; 73: 444-472.
 
22.
Kazén M, Kaschel R, Kuhl J. Individual differences in intention initiation under demanding conditions: interactive effects of state vs. action orientation and enactment difficulty. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/p....
 
23.
Puchała W. Poziom kontroli własnego działania u młodzieży w zależności od jej samooceny oraz poczucia umiejscowienia kontroli. Available at: http://www.ejournals.eu/Psycho....
 
24.
Marszał-Wiśniewska M. Adaptacja Skali Kontroli Działania J. Kuhla (ACS-90). Studia Psychologiczne 2002; 40: 77-106.
 
25.
Guilford JG. Podstawowe metody statystyczne w psychologii i pedagogice. PWN, Warsaw 1964; 171.
 
26.
Beck U. Społeczeństwo ryzyka. W drodze do innej nowoczesności. Scholar, Warsaw 2004.
 
27.
Giddens A. Nowoczesność i tożsamość. PWN, Warsaw 2007.
 
28.
Sotwin W. Wola jako wypadkowa (emergentna) procesów psychicznych. Studia Psychologiczne 2003; 41: 127-146.
 
29.
Sotwin W. Jak działa wola, czyli dynamika umysłu. Wydawnictwo SWPS Academica, Warsaw 2010.
 
eISSN:2300-6722
ISSN:1899-1874
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top