Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
ORIGINAL PAPER
The saphenous vein harvest procedure affects the arteriovenous system and postoperative wound healing in patients following coronary aortic bypass surgery
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart and Lung Transplantation and Mechanical Circulation Support, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland Head of the Department: Tomasz Hrapkowicz MD, PhD
 
2
Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland Head of the Department: Dr Ryszard Walas
 
3
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medical Sciences. Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland Head of the Department: Agnieszka Machorowska-Pieniążek MD, PhD
 
4
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland Head of the Department: Jerzy Pacholewicz MD, PhD
 
 
Submission date: 2022-11-23
 
 
Final revision date: 2022-12-20
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-12-26
 
 
Publication date: 2023-03-31
 
 
Corresponding author
Karol Froń
Karol Froń Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart and Lung Transplantation and Mechanical Circulation Support Medical University of Silesia ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 9 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
 
 
Medical Studies 2023;39(1):1-7
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
One of the parts of the coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) process is the collection of vascular material, which is then employed as a coronary aortic bypass due to the large number of coronary vessels necessitating an aorto-coronary bypass. An invasive surgical operation called saphenous vein harvest, also known as the great saphenous vein (GSV), has the potential to cause surgical site infection (SSI). There are currently 2 methods for harvesting GSV: the conventional method open vein harvest (OVH) and the endoscopic, minimally invasive method endoscopic vein harvest (EVH). The clinical issue is whether the GSV harvest approach can influence the patient’s lower limb arteriovenous systems and help to lessen postoperative problems.

Aim of the research:
To analyse the healing of a surgical incision on the lower limb and the effect of GSV harvest methods on the arteriovenous system.

Material and methods:
In the study period May–September 2022, 60 patients with ischaemic heart disease, who were scheduled for surgical heart revascularization, were included. Clinical information was collected from 60 patients who met the inclusion criteria and were split into 2 groups at random.

Results and conclusions:
The arteriovenous system of the lower extremities was unaffected by either the OVH or EVH methods utilized to harvest GSV. The OVH approach resulted in a higher rate of SSI in patients with an elevated risk of SSI based on the BHIS scale, particularly in individuals with atherosclerosis of the lower limbs.
REFERENCES (14)
1.
Serruys P, Morice M, Kappetein P, Colombo A, Holmes D, Mack M, Ståhle E, Feldman D, van den Brand M, Bass E, Van Dyck N, Leadley K, Dawkins K, Mohr F. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 961-972.
 
2.
Hannan E, Wu C, Walford G, Culliford A, Gold J, Smith C, Higgins R, Carlson R, Jones R. Drug-eluting stents vs. coronary-artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 331-341.
 
3.
Captur G. Memento for René Favaloro. Tex Heart Inst J 2004; 31: 47-60.
 
4.
Raja SG, Haider Z, Ahmad M, Zaman H. Saphenous vein grafts: to use or not to use? Heart Lung Circ 2004; 13: 403-409.
 
5.
Andreasen J, Nekrasas V, Dethlefsen C. Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34: 384-389.
 
6.
Raja S G, Rochon M, Jarman J. Brompton Harefield Infection Score (BHIS): development and validation of a stratification tool for predicting risk of surgical site infection after coronary artery bypass grafting. Int J Surg 2015; 16: 69-73.
 
7.
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Surveillance of healthcare-associated infections and prevention indicators in European intensive care units. Stockholm: ECDC; 2017.
 
8.
Sarzaeem M, Mandegar M, Roshanali F, Vedadian A, Sai- di B, Alaeddini F, Tabarestani N. Scoring system for predicting SVG patency. Tex Heart Inst J 2010; 37: 525-530.
 
9.
Bluger M, Jacobs C, Patel H. Epidemiology of acute deep vein thrombosis. Techniques Vasc Interv Radiol 2004: 7: 50-54.
 
10.
Wells P, Anderson D, Rodger M, Forgie M, Kearon C, Dreyer J, Kovacs G, Mitchell M, Lewandowski B, Ko- vacs M. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1227-1235.
 
11.
Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Prins MH. Management studies using a combination of D-dimer test result and clinical probability to rule out venous tromboembolism: a systematic review. J Thromb Haemostasis 2005; 3: 2465-2470.
 
12.
Birkmeyer J, O’Connor G, Quinton H, Ricci M, Mor- ton J, Leavitt B, Charlesworth D, Hernandez F, McDa- niel M. The effect of peripheral vascular disease on in-hospital mortality rates with coronary artery bypass surgery. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21: 445-452.
 
13.
Spannbauer A, Jaworek J, Chwała M Mika P. Na ile maksymalny dystans chromania oceniany przez chorego odpowiada rzeczywistości? Pielęg Chir Angiol 2009; 4: 139-143.
 
14.
Gurkan S, Gur O, Yuksel V, Tastekin E, Huseyin S, Gur Do, Canbaz S. The effect of distension pressure on endothelial injury and vasodilatation respon se in saphenous vein grafts: conversion of a bypass graft to a dead pipe. Kardiochir Torakochir Pol 2014; 11: 119-125.
 
eISSN:2300-6722
ISSN:1899-1874
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top