REVIEW PAPER
Unified cytological reports determine the clinical management
1
ESKULAP Student Scientific Organization, Department of Clinical and Experimental Pathomorphology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
2
Department of Clinical and Experimental Pathomorphology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
3
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
Submission date: 2018-10-27
Final revision date: 2019-05-25
Acceptance date: 2019-05-26
Publication date: 2019-06-28
Medical Studies 2019;35(2):147-152
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
All types of cytological procedures bear a burden of unequivocal reports and confusion with setting a proper clinical procedure. In 1989, The Bethesda System (TBS) was introduced to resolve many concerns in the matter of unclear classification of changes in cervical cytology. The guidelines of TBS were based on the clinical data provided, the quality of the smear assessment, unification of terminology, and updated knowledge about changes underlying cell abnormalities. It is believed that both TBS and thyroid TBS inspired the members of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytology to design and publish a modern approach to pancreatic lesion description. The presented proposal created a strong foundation for clinical management and revealed a serious risk of underdiagnosis. In light of the short time since the launch of this guide, more time is needed to estimate its impact, especially since only a few clinical centres have implemented it to this day.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Gornicka B. Trudności i pułapki w diagnostyce cytologicznej zmian ogniskowych tarczycy. Onkol Dypl 2015; 5.
2.
National Cancer Institute Workshop. The Bethesda system for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses. JAMA 1989; 262: 931-34.
3.
Kurman RJ, Solomon D. The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical/Vaginal Cytologic Diagnoses. Definitions, Criteria, and Explanatory Notes for Terminology and Specimen Adequacy. Springer-Verlag, New York 1994.
4.
Kurman RJ, Solomon D. The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical/Vaginal Cytologic Diagnoses: Definitions, Criteria, and Explanatory Notes for Terminology and Specimen Adequacy. Springer, 1994.
5.
Ritu N, Wilbur DC. The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology: Definitions, Criteria, and Explanatory Notes. Springer, 2015.
6.
Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA. Fine-needle aspiration of the thyroid: today and tomorrow. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 22: 929-939.
7.
Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA, Asa SL, Rosai J, Merino MJ, Randolph G, Vielh P, DeMayRM, Sidawy MK, Frable WJ. Diagnostic terminology and morphologic criteria for cytologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions: a synopsis of the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Diagn Cytopathol 2008; 36: 425-437.
8.
Baloch ZW, Cibas ES, Clark DP, Layfield LJ, Ljung BM, Pitman MB, Abati A. The National Cancer Institute Thyroid fine needle aspiration state of the science conference: a summation. Cytojournal 2008; 5: 6.
9.
Kholová I, Ludvíková M. Thyroid atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance: an indispensable Bethesda 2010 diagnostic category or waste garbage? Acta Cytol 2014; 58: 319-329.
10.
Olson MT, Boonyaarunnate T, Atlinboga AA, Ali SZ. Suspicious for papillary thyroid carcinoma’ before and after the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: impact of standardized terminology. Acta Cytol 2014; 58: 15-22.
11.
Pitman MB, Layfield LJ. The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology. Springer International Publishing 2015.
12.
Pitman MB, Layfield LJ. Guidelines for pancreaticobiliary cytology from the papanicolaou society of cytopathology: a review. Cancer Cytopathol 2014; 122: 399-411.
13.
Tanaka M, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Adsay V, Chari S, Falconi M, Jang JY, Kimura W, Levy P, Pitman MB, Schmidt CM, Shimizu M, Wolfgang CL, Yamaguchi K, Yamao K; International Association of Pancreatology. International Association of Pancreatology. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2012; 12: 183-197.
14.
Pitman MB, Lewandrowski K, Shen J, Sahani D, Brugge W, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Pancreatic cysts: preoperative diagnosis and clinical management. Cancer Cytopathol 2010; 118: 1-13.
15.
Wright TC Jr, Behrens CM, Ranger-Moore J, Rehm S, Sharma A, Stoler MH, Ridder R. Triaging HPV-positive women with p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology: results from a sub-study nested into the ATHENA trial. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 144: 51-56.
16.
Wright TC, Stoler MH, Behrens CM, Sharma A, Zhang G, Wright TL. Primary cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus: end of study results from the ATHENA study using HPV as the first-line screening test. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 136: 189-197.
17.
Yu LL, Guo HQ, Lei XQ, Qin Y, Wu ZN, Kang LN, Zhang X, Qiao YL, Chen W. p16/Ki-67 co-expression associates high risk human papillomavirus persistence and cervical histopathology: a 3-year cohort study in China. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 64810-64819.
18.
Possati-Resende JC, Fregnani JH, Kerr LM, Mauad EC, Longatto-Filho A, Scapulatempo-Neto C. The accuracy of p16/Ki-67 and HPV test in the detection of CIN2/3 in women diagnosed with ASC-US or LSIL. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0134445.
19.
Yu LL, Guo HQ, Lei XQ, Qin Y, Wu ZN, Kang LN, Zhang X, Qiao YL, Chen W. p16/Ki-67 co-expression associates high risk human papillomavirus persistene and cervical histopathology: a 3-year cohort study in China. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 64810-64819.
20.
Lewitowicz P, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Rokita W, Adamczyk Gruszka O, Gluszek S, Chrapek M, Kolos M, Wrona-Cyranowska A, Misiek M. HPV genotyping and p16/Ki-67 test significantly improve detection rate of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion. Arch Med Sci 2018. doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2018.80697.
21.
Krauss EA, Mahon M, Fede JM, Zhang L. Application of the Bethesda classification for thyroid fine-needle aspiration: institutional experience and meta-analysis. Arch Pathol Labor Med 2016; 140: 1121-1131.
22.
Kholová I, Ludvíková M. Thyroid atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance: an indispensable Bethesda 2010 diagnostic category or waste garbage? Act Cytol 2014; 58: 319-329.
23.
Olson MT, Boonyaarunnate T, Atlinboga AA, Ali SZ. ”Suspicious for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma’ before and after the Bethesda System for reporting thyroid cytopathology: impact of standardized terminology. Acta Cytol 2014; 58: 15-22.
24.
Jarząb B, Dedecjus M, Słowińska-Klencka D, Lewiński A, Adamczewski Z, Anielski R, Bagłaj M, Bałdys-Waligórska A, Barczyński M, Bednarczuk T, Bossowski A, Buziak-Bereza M, Chmielik E, Cichocki A, Czarniecka A, Czepczyński R, Dzięcioł J, Gawlik T, Handkiewicz-Junak D, Hasse-Lazar K, Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A, Jażdżewski K, Jurecka-Lubieniecka B, Kalemba M, Kamiński G, Karbownik-Lewińska M, Klencki M, Kos-Kudła B, Kotecka-Blicharz A, Kowalska A, Krajewska J, Kropińska A, Kukulska A, Kulik E, Kułakowski A, Kuzdak K, Lange D, Ledwon A, Lewandowska-Jabłońska E, Łącka K, Michalik B, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Nauman J, Niedziela M, Małecka-Tendera E, Oczko-Wojciechowska M, Olczyk T, Paliczka-Cieślik E, Pomorski L, Puch Z, Roskosz J, Ruchała M, Rusinek D, Sporny S, Stanek-Widera A, Stojcev Z, Syguła A, Syrenicz A, Szpak-Ulczok S, Tomkalski T, Wygoda Z, Włoch J, Zembala-Nożyńska E. Guidelines of Polish National Societies diagnostics and treatment of thyroid carcinoma. 2018 update. Endokrynol Pol 2018; 69: 34-74.
25.
Perez-Machado MA. Pancreatic cytology: standardized terminology and nomenclature. Cytopathology 2016; 27: 157-160.
26.
McKinley M, Newman M. Observations on the application of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology standardized terminology and nomenclature for pancreaticobiliary cytology. Pathology 2016; 48: 353-356.
27.
Lewitowicz P, Matykiewicz J, Heciak J, Koziel D, Gluszek S. Percutaneous fine needle biopsy in pancreatic tumors: a study of 42 cases. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012; 2012: 908963.
28.
Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Lewitowicz P. Diagnostyka nowotworów trzustki EUS/BAC i BAC przez skórna. Pol J Pathol 2016; 67 (supl. 1): 18-19.
| eISSN: | 2300-6722 |
| ISSN: | 1899-1874 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
