Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
REVIEW PAPER
Contemporary methods of treatment of colorectal cancer
 
More details
Hide details
 
Publication date: 2016-01-11
 
 
Medical Studies 2015;31(4):307-312
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Today, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently diagnosed worldwide malignant cancer in males, and the second in females, with more than 1,200,000 new cases and more than 600,000 deaths, annually. Screening tests in oncology allow the detection of cancerous disease at an early, asymptomatic stage. The procedures most frequently performed in the case of colorectal cancer include: low anterior resection by the Dixon method (manual suture or staplers); abdominoperineal resection of the rectum by the Miles method; surgical procedure by the Hartmann method; local resection. Various techniques of preoperative radiotherapy are applied, aimed at tumour mass reduction (scheme I) and/or obtaining local sterilisation (schemes I and II), which results in the reduction of local metastases (by approximately 50%), as well as an improvement with respect to long-term survival (by approximately 10%). At present, the following drugs for treatment of various forms of colorectal cancer have been registered by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA): fluorouracil capecitabine irinotecan, oxaliplatin, cetuximab, and bevacizumab. The combination of complete cytoreductive surgery (CCS), the goal of which is the removal of all visible (macroscopically) cancer foci, with a simultaneous intraperitoneal chemotherapy in hyperthermia – HIPEC, destroying microscopic remains of the disease, allows the curing of some patients with peritoneal cancer. The effect of the action of monoclonal antibodies – cetuximab and panitumumab – is the inhibition of proliferation of cancer cells, intensification of their apoptosis, as well as reduction of synthesis and secretion of pro-angiogenic factors, such as interleukin 8 (IL-8) and vascular endothelial growth factor. In addition, antibodies targeted against EGFR impair the repair of DNA damage caused by chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the cells of the malignant tumour.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Wiraszka G, Kielar M, Stępień R. Assessment of the risk of colorectal cancer in Poland on the basis of the analysis of epidemiological indicators. Studia Medyczne 2015; 31: 66-74.
 
2.
Maliszewski D, Jastrzębski T, Drucis K, et al. Czynniki prognostyczne w raku jelita grubego – co możemy dodać do standardu? Współcz Onkol 2008; 12: 212-6.
 
3.
Grzebieniak Z, Szynglarewicz B. Czynniki prognostyczne w raku okrężnicy i odbytnicy. Prz Lek 2004; 61: 43-53.
 
4.
Dziki A, Wallner G. Wytyczne diagnostyczno-terapeutyczne w raku jelita grubego. Stowarzyszenie Popierania Rozwoju Proktologii 2007.
 
5.
Głuszek S, Matykiewicz J, Kot M. Nowotwory odbytnicy leczone chirurgicznie z dostępu przez odbyt. Gastroenterol Pol 2000; 7: 91-5.
 
6.
Kozłowska M, Głuszek S. Analysis of complications after surgery for colorectal cancer with particular consideration to anastomotic leakage. Studia Medyczne 2015; 31: 82-9.
 
7.
Głuszek S, Korczak M, Kot M, et al. Przetoki przewodu pokarmowego – problem wciąż aktualny. Pol Prz Chir 2011; 83: 53-69.
 
8.
Bujko K. Leczenie chorych na raka odbytnicy. Gastroenterol Klin 2011; 3: 65-71.
 
9.
Negri FV, Campanini N, Camisa R, et al. Biological predictive factors in rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. Br J Cancer 2008; 98: 143-7.
 
10.
Bertolini F, Bengala C, Losi L, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of baseline and posttreatment molecular marker expression in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 68: 1455-61.
 
11.
Edden Y, Wexner SD, Berho M. The use of molecular markers as a method to predict the response to neoadjuvant therapy for advanced stage rectal adenocarcinoma. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 555-61.
 
12.
Pinto C, Di Fabio F, Maiell E, et al. Phase II study of panitumumab, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and concurrent radiotherapy as preoperative treatment in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer patients (StarPan/STAR-02 Study). Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 2424-30.
 
13.
Douillard JY. Panitumumab – FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Eng J Med 2013; 369: 1023-34.
 
14.
Ellina MI, Bouris P, Aletras AJ, et al. EGFR and HER2 exert distinct roles on colon cancer cell functional properties and expression of matrix macromolecules. Biochim Biophys Acta 2014; 1840: 2651-61.
 
15.
Yokomizo H, Yoshimatsu K, Otani T, et al. Practical use of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPEOX) with bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer that cannot expect conversion therapy. Hepatogastroenterology 2013; 60: 1911-5.
 
16.
Van Emburgh BO, Sartore-Bianchi A, Di Nicolantonio F, et al. Acquired resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies in colorectal cancer. Mol Oncol 2014; 8: 1084-94.
 
17.
Venook AP. Bevacizumab vs. EGFR antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2015; 13: 90-2.
 
18.
Ying HQ, Wang F, He BS, et al. The involvement of Kras gene 3’-UTR polymorphisms in risk of cancer and influence on patient response to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther 2014; 25; 1487-96.
 
19.
Wojtukiewicz ZM, Tokajuk P, Sierko E. Leczenie interferujące z receptorem czynnika wzrostu naskórka (EGFR) u chorych na raka jelita grubego. Onkol Prakt Klin 2010; 6: 241-54.
 
20.
Cervantes A. Exploring better strategies for EGFR antibodies in colon cancer. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 549-50.
 
21.
Feng QY, Wei Y, Chen JW, et al. Anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF agents: important targeted therapies of colorectal liver metastases. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 4263-75.
 
22.
Van Cutsem E, Dicato M, Haustermans K, et al. The diagnosis and management of rectal cancer: expert discussion and recommendations derived from the 9th World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2007. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 1-8.
 
eISSN:2300-6722
ISSN:1899-1874
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top