Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Evaluation of self-adjusting file (SAF) damage during root canal therapy. An in vitro study
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Conservative Dentistry with Endodontics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
 
2
Private Medical Practice Natalia Smuga, Sanok, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2025-03-31
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-07-27
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-07-31
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-07-07
 
 
Publication date: 2026-10-01
 
 
Corresponding author
Monika Szmidt-Kądys   

Department of Conservative Dentistry with Endodontics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
 
 
Medical Studies 2026;42(3):371-376
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The complex anatomy of root canal systems poses significant challenges for clinicians. In curved canals, fracture of endodontic instruments often prevents retrieval, compromising effective cleaning and shaping. The Self-Adjusting File (SAF) system was developed to enable efficient root canal preparation while reducing the risk of instrument fracture.

Aim of the research:
To evaluate the incidence and nature of damage to SAF files during the preparation of human root canals.

Material and methods:
Forty extracted human root canals were included. Preoperative radiographic assessment was performed. Canals were prepared following the manufacturer’s protocol using the SAF system, operated in four-minute cycles. After each cycle, file integrity was assessed under 5× magnification using an operating microscope.

Results:
All forty SAF files exhibited damage. A total of 34 cracks, 3 separations, and 3 other deformations were observed. Specifically, 32 strut fractures, 5 junction point failures, and 3 beam deformations were recorded. Neither canal curvature nor cross-sectional morphology significantly influenced the type or frequency of damage. The number of instrumentation cycles did not affect the timing of initial damage.

Conclusions:
In this study, canal curvature, cross-sectional shape, and instrumentation time did not significantly impact SAF file damage, which predominantly involved strut fractures. Importantly, instrumentation was completed in all cases despite file damage. These results suggest that the SAF system is a safe and effective tool for root canal preparation in anatomically complex canals.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature – Part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success. Int Endod J. 2007; 40(12): 921-939.
 
2.
Torabinejad M, Walton RE. Endodontics: Principles and Practice. 5th ed. Elsevier 2015.
 
3.
Grande NM, Castagnola R, Minciacchi I, Marigo L, Plotino G. A review of the latest developments in rotary NiTi technology and root canal preparation. Aust Dent J. 2023; 68 Suppl 1: S24-S38.
 
4.
Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endodont Topics. 2005; 10: 30-76.
 
5.
Thompson SA, Dummer PM. Shaping ability of ProFile.04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1. Int Endodont J. 1997; 30: 1-7.
 
6.
Robberecht L, Delattre J, Meire M. Isthmus morphology influences debridement efficacy of activated irrigation: a laboratory study involving biofilm mimicking hydrogel removal and high-speed imaging. Int Endod J. 2023; 56(1): 118-127.
 
7.
Parikh H, Bharatiya R, Ujariya U, Kothari A. Curved paths: a comprehensive review and case insights into root canal anatomy. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024; 27(12): 1310-1314.
 
8.
Zanza A, D’Angelo M, Rodolfo R, Gambarini G, Testarelli L, Di Nardo D. An update on nickel-titanium rotary instruments in endodontics: mechanical characteristics, testing and future perspective – an overview. Bioengineering (Basel). 2021; 8: 218.
 
9.
Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1998; 14: 346-351.
 
10.
Spili P, Parashos P, Messer HH. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2005; 31(12): 845-850.
 
11.
Saunders JL, Eleazer PD, Zhang P, Michalek S. Effect of a separated instrument on bacterial penetration of obturated root canals. J Endod. 2004; 30(3): 177-179.
 
12.
Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Zary R, Cohen R, Hof R. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 1: respecting the root canal anatomy- a new concept of endodontic files and its implementation. J Endod. 2010; 30: 679-690.
 
13.
Metzger Z, Kfir A, Abramovitz I, Weissman A, Solomo- nov M. The Self-adjusting File system. ENDO (Lond Eng). 2013; 7: 189-210.
 
14.
Metzger Z. The self-adjusting file (SAF) system: an evidence-based update. J Cons Dent. 2014; 17: 401-419.
 
15.
Hof R, Perevalov V, Eltanani M, Zary R, Metzger Z. The self-adjusting-file (SAF). Part 2: mechanical analysis. J Endod. 2010; 36: 691-6. .
 
16.
Kapadia KH, Patni PM, Jain P, Raghuvanshi S, Pandey SH, Singhal RR. Assessment of minimally invasive file systems on resistance to fracture using traditional and contracted access cavity designs in the maxillary first and second molars. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2023; 26(4): 395-401.
 
17.
Farmakis ET, Sotiropoulos GG, Pantazis N, Kozyrakis K. The permanent deformation of the self-adjusting files when used in canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2013; 9: 863-869.
 
18.
Akçay I, Yiğit-Özer S, Adigüzel Ö, Kaya S. Deformation of the self-adjusting file on simulated curved root canals: a time dependent study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 112: e12-e17.
 
19.
Solomonov M, Ben-Itzhak J, Kfir A, von Stetten O, Lipatova E, Farmakis ET. Self-adjusting file (SAF) separation in clinical use: a preliminary survey among experienced SAF users regarding prevalence and retrieval methods. J Conserv Dent. 2015; 18(3): 200-204.
 
20.
Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod. 2000; 26: 161-165.
 
21.
Cheung GS, Peng B, Bian Z, Shen Y, Darvell BW. Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: fractographic examination. Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 802-809.
 
22.
Plotino G, Grande NM, Cordaro M, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. A review of cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2009; 35(11): 1469-1476.
 
23.
Lee MH, Versluis A, Kim BM, Lee CJ, Hur B, Kim HC. Correlation between experimental cyclic fatigue resistance and numerical stress analysis for nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod. 2011; 37: 1152-1157.
 
24.
Plotino G, Grande NM, Mercadé Bellido M, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Influence of temperature on cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal Rotary Files. J Endod. 2017; 43: 200-202.
 
25.
Roda-Casanova V, Pérez-González A, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Faus-Matoses V. Fatigue analysis of NiTi rotary endodontic files through finite element simulation: effect of root canal geometry on fatigue life. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(23): 56-92.
 
26.
Kwak SW, Ha JH, Shen Y, Haapasalo M, Kim HC. Effects of root canal curvature and mechanical properties of nickel-titanium files on torque generation. J Endod. 2021; 47: 1501-1506.
 
27.
Schrader C, Peters OA. Analysis of torque and force with differently tapered rotary endodontic instruments in vitro. J Endod. 2005; 31: 120-123.
 
28.
Paqué F, Balmer M, Attin T, Peters OA. Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod. 2010; 36: 703-707.
 
eISSN:2300-6722
ISSN:1899-1874
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top