Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Evaluation of the effect of dry needling according to the FRS concept on gait parameters in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomised, double-blind clinical trial
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Health Sciences, University of Opole, Poland
 
2
Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Poland
 
3
Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
 
4
Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2025-01-17
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-05-26
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-06-01
 
 
Publication date: 2026-04-08
 
 
Corresponding author
Joanna Barbara Rajfur   

Institute of Health Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland
 
 
Medical Studies 2026;42(1):92-100
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Dry needling (DN) has become an increasingly popular treatment in recent years for a number of musculoskeletal dysfunctions, including low back pain (LBP) syndromes. The Five Regulatory Systems (FRS) concept is an innovative strategy for the use of dry needling, which is based on therapeutic mechanisms. Aim of the research: Evaluation of the effect of dry needling (DN), according to the FRS concept, on gait parameters in patients with chronic LBP.

Material and methods:
The study included 40 patients with LBP assigned to the experimental group (n = 20, dry needling + rehabilitation) or control group (n = 20, sham dry needling + rehabilitation). A Zebris FDM-T treadmill was used to objectively measure gait parameters. Measurements were taken before and immediately after the intervention and at 1- and 3-month follow-ups.

Results:
After the treatment, there was no significant improvement in gait in patients in both groups, at both 2 and 4 km/h. There were no differences between the comparison groups for both walking speeds (p > 0.05 in all analyses). There were beneficial changes in peak linear velocity during patient ambulation (foot propulsion on the treadmill during walking). However, there were no differences between the comparison groups (p > 0.05 in all analyses).

Conclusions:
Dry needling according to the FRS concept does not have a beneficial effect on improving gait parameters in patients with chronic LBP.
REFERENCES (13)
1.
Ilayaraja A, Shaju MKF, Singh SS, Gerald ER, Sathyanarayana D, Hema RI. Effectiveness of dry needling and low-level laser therapy in nonspecific low back pain. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020; 14(11): 5-7.
 
2.
Bazzaz-Yamchi M, Naghdi S, Nakhostin-Ansari A, Hadizadeh M, Ansari N.N, Moghimi E, Hasson S. Acute and short-term effects of dry needling in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain and hamstring tightness: a pilot study. Sci World J. 2021; 2021: 7259956.
 
3.
Lara-Palomo IC, Gil-Martínez E, López-Fernández MD, González González LM, Querol-Zaldívar MLÁ, Castro-Sánchez AM. Efficacy of dry needling for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Altern Ther Health Med. 2023; 29(8): 110-120.
 
4.
Yu H, Wang D, Verville L, Southerst D, Bussières A, Gross DP, Pereira P, Mior S, Tricco AC, Cedraschi C, Brunton G, Nordin M, Shearer HM, Wong JJ, Connell G, Myrtos D, da Silva-Oolup S, Young JJ, Funabashi M, Romanel- li A, Lee JGB, Stuber K, Guist B, Muñoz Laguna J, Hofstetter L, Murnaghan K, Hincapié CA, Cancelliere C. Systematic review to inform a World Health Organization (WHO) clinical practice guideline: benefits and harms of needling therapies for chronic primary low back pain in adults. J Occup Rehabil. 2023; 33(4): 661-672.
 
5.
Sánchez-Infante J, Navarro-Santana MJ, Bravo-Sánchez A, Jiménez-Diaz F, Abián-Vicén J. Is dry needling applied by fhysical therapists effective for pain in musculoskeletal conditions? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2021; 101(3): pzab070.
 
6.
Rajfur J, Rajfur K. Selected needling techniques in pain associated with musculoskeletal disorders: a narrative review. Med Sci Pulse. 2022; 16(1): 57-65.
 
7.
Lucena-Anton D, Luque-Moreno C, Valencia-Medero J, Garcia-Munoz C, Moral-Munoz JA. Effectiveness of dry needling of myofascial trigger points in the triceps surae muscles: systematic review. Healthcare. 2022; 10(10): 1862. .
 
8.
Zügel M, Maganaris CN, Wilke J, Jurkat-Rott K, Klin- gler W, Wearing SC, Findley T, Barbe MF, Steinacker JM, Vleeming A, Bloch W, Schleip R, Hodges PW. Fascial tissue research in sports medicine: from molecules to tissue adaptation, injuries and diagnostics – consensus statement. Br J Sports Med. 2018; 52(23): 1497.
 
9.
Rajfur J, Rajfur K, Kosowski Ł, Walewicz K, Dymarek R, Ptaszkowski K, Taradaj J. The effectiveness of dry needling in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1): 15803.
 
10.
Rajfur J, Rajfur K, Matusz T, Malarska M, Walewicz K, Ptaszkowski K, Dymarek R, Taradaj J. Dry needling with the use of FRSc technique in addition to standard rehabilitation program for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial using both PROMs and measurement tools. J Pain Res. 2024; 17: 1041-1053.
 
11.
Dach F, Ferreira KS. Treating myofascial pain with dry needling: a systematic review for the best evidence-based practices in low back pain. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2023; (12): 1169-1178.
 
12.
Hu HT, Gao H, Ma RJ, Zhao XF, Tian HF, Li L. Is dry needling effective for low back pain?: a systematic review and PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Medicine. 2018; 97(26): e11225.
 
13.
Funk MF, Frisina-Deyo AJ. Dry needling for spine related disorders: a scoping review. Chiropr Man Therap. 2020; 28(1): 23. .
 
eISSN:2300-6722
ISSN:1899-1874
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top