REVIEW PAPER
Invasive physiotherapy: patient rehabilitation fit for the 21st century. A review of clinical applications in movement dysfunctions
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education in Gorzow Wielkopolski, Poznan University of Physical Education in Poznan, Poland
2
The Kazimiera Milanowska College of Education and Therapy, Poznan, Poland
3
KORE Physiotherapy Clinic, Center for Physiotherapy and Manual Therapy, Swarzedz, Poland
Submission date: 2024-06-13
Final revision date: 2024-09-09
Acceptance date: 2024-10-01
Publication date: 2025-09-20
Corresponding author
Krzysztof M. Rujna
Krzysztof M. Rujna
Department of Physiotherapy
Faculty of Physical Education
in Gorzow Wielkopolski
Poznan University of
Physical Education
Poznan, Poland
Medical Studies 2025;41(3):161-171
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Invasive physiotherapy, including dry needling (DN), percutaneous electrolysis (PNE) and percutaneous neuromodulation (PNM), has become increasingly prominent in the treatment of neuro-musculoskeletal disorders. This paper explores the mechanisms of action involved in these techniques, their clinical efficacy as well as their areas of application. DN stimulates trigger points in muscles and, thus, relieves pain and improves motor function. PNE employs galvanic microcurrents to regenerate tissue, reducing pain and stimulating collagen production. PNM, in turn, alleviates pain and promotes neuroplasticity via electrical nerve stimulation. Although the abovementioned methods are generally considered safe, several potential side effects exist, such as myalgia and haemorrhage. Hence, further research is vital in order to establish the application standards and long-term efficacy of these techniques, which represent a valuable supplement to traditional physiotherapy methods.
REFERENCES (41)
1.
Griswold D, Wilhelm M, Donaldson M, Learman K, Cleland J. The effectiveness of superficial versus deep dry needling or acupuncture for reducing pain and disability in individuals with spine-related painful conditions: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Man Manip Ther. 2019; 27(3): 128-140.
2.
Gattie E, Cleland JA, Snodgrass S. The effectiveness of trigger point dry needling for musculoskeletal conditions by physical therapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017; 47(3): 133-149.
3.
Cagnie B, Dewitte V, Barbe T, Timmermans F, Delrue N, Meeus M. Physiologic effects of dry needling. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013; 17(8): 348.
4.
Rodríguez-Huguet M, Vinolo-Gil MJ, Góngora-Rodríguez J. Dry needling in physical therapy treatment of chronic neck pain: systematic review. J Clin Med. 2022; 11: 2370.
5.
Domingo A, Mayoral O, Monterde S, Santafé MM. Neuromuscular damage and repair after dry needling in mice. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013; 2013: 260806.
6.
Crawford PF 3rd, Moss DA, Hawks MK, Snyder MJ. Integrative medicine: acupuncture. FP Essent. 2021; 505: 18-22.
7.
Perreault T, Dunning J, Butts R. The local twitch response during trigger point dry needling: is it necessary for successful outcomes? J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017; 21(4): 940-947.
8.
Chys M, De Meulemeester K, De Greef I, Murillo C, Kindt W, Kouzouz Y, Lescroart B, Cagnie B. Clinical effectiveness of dry needling in patients with musculoskeletal pain-an umbrella review. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(3): 1205.
9.
Llurda-Almuzara L, Labata-Lezaun N, Meca-Rivera T, Navarro-Santana MJ, Cleland JA, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Pérez-Bellmunt A. Is dry needling effective for the management of plantar heel pain or plantar fasciitis? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Med. 2021; 22(7): 1630-1641.
10.
Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Nijs J. Trigger point dry needling for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: current perspectives within a pain neuroscience paradigm. J Pain Res. 2019; 12: 1899-1911.
11.
López-González L, Falla D, Lázaro-Navas I, Lorenzo-Sánchez-Aguilera C, Rodríguez-Costa I, Pecos-Martín D, Gallego-Izquierdo T. Effects of dry needling on neuromuscular control of ankle stabilizer muscles and center of pressure displacement in basketball players with chronic ankle instability: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(4): 2092.
12.
Rodine R. Trigger point dry needling: an evidenced and clinical-based approach. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2015; 59(1): 84.
13.
Muñoz M, Dommerholt J, Pérez-Palomares S, Herrero P, Calvo S. Dry needling and antithrombotic drugs. Pain Res Manag. 2022; 2022: 1363477.
14.
Taradaj J. Rekomendacje dotyczące skuteczności klinicznej suchego igłowania w świetle zasad evidence based physiotherapy (EBP). Med Manual 2020; XXIV: 27-42.
15.
Jiménez-Del-Barrio S, Medrano-de-la-Fuente R, Hernando- Garijo I, Mingo-Gómez MT, Estébanez-de-Miguel E, Ceballos-Laita L. The effectiveness of dry needling in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Life (Basel). 2022; 12(10): 1575.
16.
Malfait I, Gijsbers S, Smeets A, Hanssen B, Pick A, Peers K, Schillebeeckx F. Safety of dry needling in stroke patients: a scoping review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024; 60(2): 225-232.
17.
Choobsaz H, Ghotbi N, Ansari NN. Effects of dry needling on spasticity, cortical excitability, and range of motion in a patient with multiple sclerosis: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2024; 18(1): 125.
18.
Nuhmani S, Khan MH, Ahsan M, Abualait TS, Muaidi Q. Dry needling in the management of tendinopathy: a systematic review of randomized control trials. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2023; 33: 128-135.
19.
Mullins JF, Hoch MC, Gribble P, Heebner N, Kosik K, Westgate P, Nitz AJ. Examination of dry needling dose and effect duration for individuals with chronic ankle instability. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2023; 46(2): 132-142.
20.
Benito-de-Pedro AI, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, Losa-Iglesias ME, Rodríguez-Sanz D, Calvo-Lobo C, Benito-de-Pedro M. Efficacy of deep dry needling versus percutaneous electrolysis in ultrasound-guided treatment of active myofascial trigger points of the levator scapulae in short-term: a randomized controlled trial. Life (Basel). 2023; 13(4): 939.
21.
Sharif F, Ahmad A, Gilani SA, Bacha R, Hanif A, Arif MA. Efficacy of ultrasound guided dry needling as an adjunct to conventional physical therapy for patients with jumper’s knee: a randomized controlled trial. Front Surg. 2022; 9: 1023902.
22.
Botticchio A, Mourad F, Fernández-Carnero S, Arias- Buría JL, Santodomingo Bueno A, Mesa Jiménez J, Gob- bo M. Short-term morphological changes in asymptomatic perimandibular muscles after dry needling assessed with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging: a proof-of-concept study. J Clin Med. 2021; 10: 209.
23.
Bağcıer F, Tufanoğlu FH. A new treatment modality in piriformis syndrome: ultrasound guided dry needling treatment. Agri. 2020; 32(3): 175-176.
24.
Bagcier F, Yurdakul OV. A safer way of dry needling therapy for gastrocnemius muscles: ultrasound guidance. Med Ultrason. 2020; 22(4): 495-496.
25.
Abat F, Valles SL, Gelber PE, Polidori F, Stitik TP, García-Herreros S, Monllau JC, Sanchez-Ibánez JM. Mecanismos moleculares de reparación mediante la técnica Electrólisis Percutánea Intratisular en la tendinosis rotuliana [Molecular repair mechanisms using the Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis technique in patellar tendonitis]. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2014; 58(4): 201-205.
26.
Augustyn D, Paez A. The effectiveness of intratissue percutaneous electrolysis for the treatment of tendinopathy: a systematic review. S Afr J Sports Med. 2022; 34(1): v34i1a12754.
27.
Abat F, Gelber P, Monllau J, Sánchez-Ibáñez J. Large tear of the pectoralis major muscle in an athlete. results after treatment with intratissue percutaneous electrolysis. J Sports Med Doping Stud 2014; 4: 10.4172/2161-0673.1000139.
28.
Margalef R, Bosque M, Minaya-Muñoz F, Valera-Garrido F, Santafe MM. Safety analysis of percutaneous needle electrolysis: a study of needle composition, morphology, and electrical resistance. Acupunct Med. 2021; 39(5): 471-477.
29.
Peñin-Franch A, García-Vidal JA, Martínez CM, Escolar-Reina P, Martínez-Ojeda RM, Gómez AI, Bueno JM, Minaya-Muñoz F, Valera-Garrido F, Medina-Mirapeix F, Pelegrín P. Galvanic current activates the NLRP3 inflammasome to promote type I collagen production in tendon. Elife. 2022; 11: e73675.
30.
Sánchez-Sánchez JL, Calderón-Díez L, Herrero-Turrión J, Méndez-Sánchez R, Arias-Buría JL, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C. Changes in gene expression associated with collagen regeneration and remodeling of extracellular matrix after percutaneous electrolysis on collagenase-induced achilles tendinopathy in an experimental animal model: a pilot study. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(10): 3316.
31.
Varela-Rodríguez S, Sánchez-Sánchez JL, Velasco E, Delicado-Miralles M, Sánchez-González JL. Endogenous pain modulation in response to a single session of percutaneous electrolysis in healthy population: a double-blinded randomized clinical trial. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(10): 2889.
32.
Borrella-Andrés S, Malo-Urriés M, Pérez-Bellmunt A, Arias-Buría JL, Rodríguez-Sanz J, Albarova-Corral MI, González-Rueda V, Gallego-Sendarrubias GM, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, López-de-Celis C. Application of percutaneous needle electrolysis does not elicit temperature changes: an in vitro cadaveric study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(23): 15738.
33.
García-Vidal JA, Salinas J, Escolar-Reina P, Cuello F, Ortega N, de Dios Berná-Mestre J, López-Nicolás M, Valera-Garrido F, Medina-Mirapeix F. Galvanic current dosage and bacterial concentration are determinants of the bactericidal effect of percutaneous needle electrolysis: an in vitro study. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1): 18977.
34.
Rodríguez-Huguet M, Góngora-Rodríguez J, Lomas-Vega R, Martín-Valero R, Díaz-Fernández Á, Obrero-Gaitán E, Ibáñez-Vera AJ, Rodríguez-Almagro D. Percutaneous electrolysis in the treatment of lateral epicondylalgia: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(7): 2068.
35.
Rodriguez Lagos L, Arribas-Romano A, Fernández-Carnero J, González-Zamorano Y, Laguarta Val S. Effects of percutaneous and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on endogenous pain mechanisms in patients with musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Med. 2023; 24(4): 397-414.
36.
da Graca-Tarragó M, Lech M, Angoleri LDM, Santos DS, Deitos A, Brietzke AP, Torres IL, Fregni F, Caumo W. Intramuscular electrical stimulus potentiates motor cortex modulation effects on pain and descending inhibitory systems in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, factorial, sham-controlled study. J Pain Res. 2019; 12: 209-221.
37.
Botelho L, Angoleri L, Zortea M, Deitos A, Brietzke A, Tor- res ILS, Fregni F, Caumo W. Insights about the neuroplasticity state on the effect of intramuscular electrical stimulation in pain and disability associated with chronic myofascial pain syndrome (MPS): a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018; 12: 388.
38.
Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Ortega-Santiago R, De-la- Llave-Rincón AI, Cleland JA, Pareja JA, Fahandezh-Saddi-Díaz H, Arias-Buría JL. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus surgery for women with unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized parallel-group trial. Eur J Pain. 2023; 27(7): 860-870.
39.
Kumar K, Rizvi S. Historical and present state of neuromodulation in chronic pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014; 18(1): 387.
40.
Lin T, Gargya A, Singh H, Sivanesan E, Gulati A. Mechanism of peripheral nerve stimulation in chronic pain. Pain Med. 2020; 21 (Suppl 1): S6-12.
41.
Wilczyński J, Kasprzak A. Dynamics of changes in isometric strength and muscle imbalance in the treatment of women with low back pain. BioMed Res Int 2020; 2020: 6139535.