ORIGINAL PAPER
Lifestyle related to health and quality of life of girls at puberty in light of the KIDSCREEN-52 Questionnaire
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Developmental Age Research, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce,
Poland
Submission date: 2016-09-01
Final revision date: 2017-05-03
Acceptance date: 2017-05-31
Publication date: 2017-06-30
Medical Studies 2017;33(2):117-126
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The lifestyle of every human being, to a large extent, determines their health. Whatever young individuals do in their adult lives is extremely important for themselves and the next generations.
Aim of the research: To investigate the relationship between health-related lifestyle and the quality of life of girls in light of the KIDSCREEN-52 questionnaire.
Material and methods: The study involved 122 girls with menstrual disorders from rural and urban areas and 240 girls without any health or developmental disorders. It was conducted on patients of the Public Gynaecological Clinic for Girls in Kielce and girls attending primary and middle schools. A diagnostic survey was used including the following research tools: KIDSCREEN-52 questionnaire, authors’ survey, body mass index, and Rohrer Index.
Results: The quality of life and health of girls with menstrual disorders (group I) and girls without any health or development disorders (group II) both from rural and urban areas was assessed. Taking into account variables such as age and the living environment, it was stated that younger girls (13–14 years old) from groups I and II generally perceive their health as worse (p < 0.001). Whereas, among older girls in both groups I and II (15–16 years old), a larger percentage of respondents perceive themselves in a positive way, which results in higher self-assessment in health.
Conclusions: The application of subjective health indicators in the assessment of quality of life relating to adolescence allows us to determine disease and malpractice in the care of the population in developmental age.
REFERENCES (15)
1.
Lalonde M. A new perspective on the health of Canadians. A Working Document, Ottawa 2000.
2.
Narodowy Program Zdrowia 1996-2006. Warszawa 1996.
3.
Nowe impulsy dla młodzieży europejskiej. Biała Księga Komisji Europejskiej. ITE, Radom 2003.
4.
Nowak-Starz G. Rozwój i zagrożenia zdrowia populacji w wieku rozwojowym w okresie przemian społeczno-ekonomicznych w Polsce (Development and health threats of the youth population during socio-economic changes in Poland). Wszechnica Świętokrzyska, Kielce 2008.
5.
Robitail S, Simeon MC, Erhart M, Revens-Sieberer U, Bruil J, Auquier P; the European KIDSCREEN Group. Validation of the European proxy KIDSCREEN-52 pilot test health related quality of life questionnaire: first results. J Adolesc Health 2006; 39: 596.e1-10.
6.
The KIDSCREEN Group Europe. The KIDSCREEN Questionnaires. Quality of life questionnaires of children and adolescent. Handbook. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich Germany 2006.
7.
Swarr AE, Richards M. Longitudinal effects of adolescent girls pubertal development, perception of pubertal timing, and parental relation on eating problems. Develop Psychol 2000; 32: 636-46.
8.
Haugland S. Subjective health complains in adolescence. A cross-national comparison of prevalence and dimensionality. Eur J Public Health 2001; 11: 4-10.
9.
Woynarowska B. Międzynarodowe badania nad zachowaniami zdrowotnymi młodzieży szkolnej. Zdrowie Publiczne 2002; 112: 391-5.
10.
Woynarowska B, Jodkowska M, Oblacińska A. Samoocena zdrowia i obrazu własnego ciała u młodzieży szkolnej w Polsce. Pediatr Pol 2007; 75: 25-34.
11.
Woynarowska B, Pułtorak M, Wojciechowska A. Zachowania zdrowotne i postrzeganie własnego zdrowia przez młodzieży w wieku 11-16 lat w Polsce. Kultura Fizyczna 2007; 7-8: 11-12.
12.
Spilker B. Introduction. In: Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Spilker B (ed.). Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, 1996.
13.
Mazur J (ed). Społeczne determinanty zdrowia młodzieży szkolnej. Raport z badań HBSC 2010. Zakład Ochrony i Promocji Zdrowia Dzieci i Młodzieży, Instytut Matki i Dziecka, Warsaw 2011.
14.
Mazur J. Analiza środowiska psychospołecznego szkoły i przystosowania szkolnego uczniów gimnazjów za pomocą wskaźników sumarycznych. In: Środowisko psychospołeczne szkoły i przystosowanie szkolne a zdrowie i zachowania zdrowotne uczniów w Polsce. Woynarowska B (ed.). Wydział Pedagogiczny UW, Instytut Matki i Dziecka, Warsaw 2003; 41-84.
15.
Michel G, Bisegger C, Fuhr DC, Abel T; KIDSCREEN group. Age and gender differences in health-related quality of life of children and adolescents in Europe: a multilevel analysis. Qual Life Resh 2009; 9: 1147-57.