ORIGINAL PAPER
Preventive health examinations in the adult population – analytical study
More details
Hide details
1
St. Elizabeth University of Health and Social Work, Bratislava, Slovakia
Submission date: 2024-09-28
Final revision date: 2024-11-20
Acceptance date: 2025-04-28
Publication date: 2025-12-15
Corresponding author
Mária Kilíková
Mária Kilíková
St. Elizabeth University
of Health and Social Work
Bratislava, Slovakia
Medical Studies 2025;41(4):405-409
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The adult population in the Slovak Republic can undergo free preventive health check-ups, which are an opportunity for early detection of the disease, allowing the disease to be brought under control.
Aim of the research:
To evaluate the attitudes of the adult population towards preventive health check-ups.
Material and methods:
The sample consisted of 257 adult individuals. We used a questionnaire of our own design and assessed attitudes on a five-point Likert scale. The data were evaluated using the statistical description method. We used the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. We expressed the order of attitudes by Spearman’s ordinal correlation coefficient.
Results:
Women’s attitudes are more positive (x– = 4.12) than men’s attitudes (x– = 4.00). The highest score of ordinal correlation in the whole cohort and in men was for prevention at the dentist (x– = 4.33). In women, it was a stool examination for hidden bleeding (x– = 4.38). The age category 18–30 years considers the least that the preventive examinations are active care for the health (x– = 3.83). Individuals (n = 257) did not consider preventive check-ups as a tool for active care of their health (x– = 4.09) and did not attach importance to them (x– = 4.08). The results (p > 0.05) confirmed that age and gender do not affect the attitudes of respondents.
Conclusions:
Preventive health check-ups at the general practitioner are most neglected by the adult population aged 18–30 years. They are a high-risk age group. Men prefer prevention at the dentist, and women prefer stool examination for hidden bleeding.
REFERENCES (17)
1.
World Health Organization (2022). A short guide to cancer screening: increase effectiveness, maximize benefits and minimize harm.
2.
Tong N. Half of US adults skip common health screening, including tests for certain diseases, survey finds. Fierce healthcare [online] 2023. Available at:
https://www.fiercehealthcare.c....
3.
Farský Š. Systematic monitoring of cardiovascular risk in the primary sphere in order to reduce the incidence of preventable cardiovascular diseases. Preventive procedures. [online]. Bratislava: Ministry of Health of the Slovak Republic, 2022. [cited: 2023-03-22]. Available at: <
https://www.fpharm.uniba.sk/fi... 2023/Standardny_postup_MZ_SR_prevencie_KVO_v_lekarnach.pdf>.
4.
Marcineková M. Preventive check-ups as a factor in disease prevention and health promotion from the point of view of nursing. (Diploma thesis). Bratislava: University of Health and Social Work of St. Elisabeth Bratislava, Institute of Social Sciences and Health Care of Bl. P.P.Gojdič and V. Hopka Spišská Nová Ves, Prešov. 107p.
5.
OECD/European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (2023), Slovensko: Zdravotný profil krajiny 2023, State of Health in the EU. OECD Publishing, Paris/European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Brussels.
6.
Fathi A, Trnková Ľ, Fábryová M, et al. Avoidable risks of diseases of the circulatory system. Education by a nurse. Care for an adult patient with overweight/obesity, education by a nurse. [online]. Poprad: Infodoktor, o. z., 2020 [cited: 2023-07-08]. pp. 151-154. Available on the Internet: <
http://www.infodoktor.sk/wp-co...>.
7.
Huang HT, Kuo YM, Wang SR, Wang CF, Tsai CH. Structural factors affecting health examination behavioral intention. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13: 395.
8.
Liss DT, Uchida T, Wilkes CL, Radakrishnan A, Linder JA. General health checks in adult primary care: a review. JAMA. 2021; 325(22): 2294-230.
9.
Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Ross DA, Viner RM, Santelli JS. From advocacy to action in global adolescent health. J Adolesc Health. 2016; 59(4): 375-377.
10.
de Abreu MHNG, Cruz AJS, Borges-Oliveira AC, Martins RC, Mattos FF. Perspectives on social and environmental determinants of oral health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(24): 13429.
11.
Mochnacká I. Preventive check-ups in the context of health promotion during the COVID-19 pandemic. In: Nursing and midwifery. [online]. No. 02/2003. [Cited: 2023-10-10]. pp. 50-56. Available on the Internet: <
https://is.vszdrav.cz/do/vsz/e...>. ISSN 1339-5920.
12.
Biščiakova M. 2020. Preventive check-ups in health promotion : (diploma thesis). [online]. Bratislava: Slovak Medical University, 2020. 64 p. [cited: 2022-09-10]. Available on the Internet: <
https://opac.crzp.sk/?fn=detai...>.
14.
Saraiva MR, Rosa I, Claro I. Early-onset colorectal cancer: a review of current knowledge. World J Gastroenterol. 2023; 29(8): 1289-1303.
15.
Jayasinghe M, Prathiraja O, Caldera D, Jena R, Coffie-Pierre JA, Silva MS, Siddiqui OS. Colon cancer screening methods: 2023 update. Cureus. 2023; 15(4): e37509.
16.
Siegel RL, Jakubowski CD, Fedewa SA, Davis A, Azad NS. Colorectal cancer in the young: epidemiology, prevention, management. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2020; 40: 1-14.
17.
Nutbeam D, Lloyd JE. Understanding and responding to health literacy as a social determinant of health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2021; 42: 159-173.