ORIGINAL PAPER
Sensitive elements in the patient’s giving consent to a Health Service
More details
Hide details
1
Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
2
Polish Society of Medical Coders, Kielce, Poland
Submission date: 2024-01-22
Final revision date: 2024-04-01
Acceptance date: 2024-05-14
Publication date: 2024-09-16
Corresponding author
Kamila Kocańda
Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
Medical Studies 2024;40(3):273-278
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction::
The study rolled out in the hospitals in 2019, which covered both informed consent forms to high risk procedures, as well as surveys on the patients’ knowledge on their right to give an informed consent to treatment, has provided vital information on the key elements required to legally proceed in the process of making therapeutic decisions.
Aim of the research::
The survey asked the respondents about their command of the rules to give consent to a high-risk medical surgery or procedure.
Material and methods::
A scientific study was rolled out in 2 hospitals in the Świętokrzyskie voivodeship and was aimed to assess informed consent forms to medical procedures (surgical or high-risk ones). Concomitantly, data on the patients’ state of knowledge on their right to make an autonomous, informed decision to undergo a specific medical procedure, preceded by doctor-patient communication, were gathered in a research tool, a survey developed by its authors.
Results and conclusions::
The study has shown that in the process of giving consent to treatment carrying high risk for the patient, the very elements of the tool, i.e. the informed consent form, used to receive this type of declaration in writing (as required by the Polish legislature), and equally their content and how this information is conveyed to the patient, are of pivotal importance in giving legally effective consent to a medical procedure.
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Decision of the Supreme Court of 10 April 2015, case no. III KK 14/15, OSNKW 2015, no. 9, item 77.
2.
Dudzińska A. Wymagana informacja udzielana pacjentowi [Mandatory Information Given to the Patient]. PiP. 2008; 8: 90-102.
3.
Dziubina D. Prawny charakter zgody pacjenta na zabieg leczniczy w świetle art. 192 Kodeksu karnego [Legal Nature of the Patient’s Consent to a Medical Procedure under Article 192 of the Penal Code], Cz.PKiNP. 2000; 2: 33.
4.
Bączyk-Rozwadowska K. Prawo pacjenta do informacji według przepisów polskiego prawa medycznego [Patient’s Right to Information Under the Polish Medical Law]. St Iur Torun. 2011; 2: 59-100.
5.
Hajdukiewicz D. Obowiązek udzielenia informacji a “informacja nielegitymowana” i “informacja nadmierna” [Obligation to Provide Information Versus “Illegitimate Information” and “Excessive Information”]. PiP. 2014; 12: 79-88.
6.
Tymiński R. Obowiązek informacyjny lekarza wobec pacjenta – refleksje na tle wybranego dorobku orzeczniczego Izby Cywilnej Sądu Najwyższego [Doctor’s Obligation to Provide Information. Reflexion on the Case Law of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court]. PS. 2017; 5: 48-61.
7.
Newton-Howes PA, Bedford ND, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA. Informed consent: what do patients want to know? N Z Med J. 1998 Sep; 111(1073): 340-342.
8.
Rimer B, Jones WL, Keintz MK, Catalano RB, Engstrom PF. Informed consent: a crucial step in cancer patient education. Health Educ Q. 1984; 10 (Spec Suppl): 30-42.
9.
Stanley B, Guido J, Stanley M, Shortell D. The elderly patient and informed consent empirical findings. JAMA. 1984; 252(10): 1302-1306.
10.
Morrow G. How readable are subject consent forms? JAMA. 1980; 244(1): 56-58.
11.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw of 9 April 2019, V ACa 147/18, LEX no. 2668829.
12.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 23 November 2007, IV CSK 240/07, OSNC 2009; 01:16.
13.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Poznań of 22 November 2018, I ACa 192/18, LEX no. 2770860.
14.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Lublin of 9 October 2018, I ACa 948/17, LEX no. 2581065.
15.
Terry P. Informed consent in clinical medicine. Chest J. 2007; 131(2): 563-568.
16.
Lidz C, Meisel A, Osterweis M, Holden JL. Barriers to informed consent. Ann Intern Med. 1983; 99(4): 539-543.
17.
Paterick T, Carson G, Allen M, Paterick TE. Medical informed consent: general considerations for physicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008; 83(3): 313-319.
18.
Brenner L, Horowitz D, Horowitz D. Beyond informed consent: educating the patient, symposium: clinical risk and judicial reasoning. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 467: 348-351.
19.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Kraków of 19 January 2018, case no. I ACa 968/17, LEX no. 2550794.
20.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Kraków of 8 July 2016, case no. I ACa 360/16, LEX no. 2112375.
21.
Judgment of the Polish Supreme Court of 4 December 2018, case no.II CSK 259/08, LEX no. 577166.