Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
REVIEW PAPER
Surgeon’s dilemma: should I save patient’s life at any cost?
 
More details
Hide details
1
Regional Hospital, Kielce, Poland
 
2
Clinical Department of General Oncology and Endocrinology Surgery, Provincial Polyclinic Hospital, Kielce, Poland
 
3
Department of Surgery and Surgical Nursing with the Scientific Research Laboratory, Institute of Medical Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2017-08-30
 
 
Final revision date: 2017-11-16
 
 
Acceptance date: 2017-11-27
 
 
Publication date: 2017-12-31
 
 
Medical Studies 2017;33(4):321-324
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Every doctor practicing treatment in the field of medicine may be confronted with a serious question: should I save my patient’s life at any cost? If a doctor resigns from emergency procedures, he/she will risk the patient’s death. However, if he/she decides to proceed regardless of a Jehovah’s Witness patient’s statement of will, in which he or she refuses transfusion, he/she takes a risk of illegal medical intervention. There is neither an easy answer, nor a serious solution, thus the only way is to choose the lesser of two evils. Notwithstanding legal issues, there are still ethical problems, which result in an internal dilemma for a doctor.
REFERENCES (31)
1.
Wong DSY. Blood transfusion and Jehovah’s Witnesses revisited: implications for surgeons. Surg Pract 2012; 16: 128-132.
 
2.
Woolley S. Jehovah’s Witnesses in the emergency department: what are their rights? Emerg Med J 2005; 22: 869-871.
 
3.
Juth N, Lynøe N. Are there morally relevant differences between hymen restoration and bloodless treatment for Jehovah’s Witnesses? Juth and Lynøe BMC Medical Ethics 2014; 15: 89.
 
4.
McCartney S, Guinn N, Roberson R, Broomer B, White W, Hill S. Jehovah’s Witnesses and cardiac surgery: a single institution’s experience. Transfusion 2014; 54: 2745-2752.
 
5.
Dumitru AP. The anesthesiologist and the Jehovah’s Witness, anesthesia and analgesia. Curr Ress 1996; 4: 5.
 
6.
Polish Journal of Laws 2017, pos. 125.
 
7.
Dziubina D. Prawny charakter zgody pacjenta na zabieg leczniczy w świetle art. 192 Kodeksu karnego. Czasopismo Prawa Karnego i Nauk Penalnych 2000; 2: 33.
 
8.
Filar M. Postępowanie lecznicze (świadczenia zdrowotne) w stosunku do pacjenta niezdolnego do wyrażenia zgody. Prawo i Medycyna 2003; 13: 41.
 
9.
Zoll A. Granice legalności zabiegu medycznego. Prawo i Medycyna 1999; 1: 29.
 
10.
Żelichowski M. Doktorze, możesz mnie leczyć. Rzeczposp Prawo Co Dnia 1999; 7: 19.
 
11.
Zoll A. Zaniechanie leczenia – aspekty prawne. Prawo i Medycyna 2000; 5: 31.
 
12.
Douglas M, Richardbraen G. The Jehovah’s Witness blood refusal card: ethical and medicolegal considerations for emergency physicians. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5: 8.
 
13.
Kulesza J. Glosa do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 27 października 2005 r., III CK 155/05, Palestra 2007; 3-4: 316.
 
14.
Supreme Court Decisions, Civil Chamber, III C 155/05, 2006; 7-8: 137.
 
15.
Syska M. Stanowisko Sądu Najwyższego wobec oświadczeń pro futuro. In: Medyczne oświadczenia pro futuro na tle prawnoporównawczym. Warsaw 2013.
 
16.
Michelle CT, Coleman HR, Morritt Taub LF. A case study of an older adult with severe anemia refusing blood transfusion. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2007; 19: 43-48.
 
17.
Ohto H, Yonemura Y, Takeda J, Inada E, Hanada R, Hayakawa S, Miyano T, Kai K, Iwashi W, Muto K, Asai F; Japanese Society of Transfusion Medicine and Cell Therapy (JSTMCT). Guidelines for managing conscientious objection to blood transfusion. Transfus Med Rev 2009; 23: 221-228.
 
18.
Tymiński R. Glosa do wyroku SN z dnia 7 listopada 2008 r., II CSK 259/08. Prawo i Medycyna 2011; 3: 133.
 
19.
Nesterowicz M. Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 23 listopada 2007 r., IV CSK 240/07. Orzecznictwo Sądów Polskich 2010; 1: 4.
 
20.
Sauer CW, Marc-Aurele KL. Attempting to honor beliefs of Jehovah’s Witnesses at the edge of viability in an infant born at 23 weeks’ gestational age. Am J Case Rep 2016; 17: 375-378.
 
21.
Tomonori A, Shiro H. Medical, legal and ethical considerations concerning the choice of bloodless medicine by Jehovah’s Witnesses. Legal Medicine 2003; 5 Suppl.: 72-75.
 
22.
Banja JD. Overriding the Jehovah’s Witness patient’s refusal of blood: a reply to Cahana, Weibel, and Hurst. Pain Med 2009; 10: 878-882.
 
23.
Simou M, Thomakos N, Zagouri F, Vlysmas A, Akrivos N, Zacharakis D, Papadimitriou CA, Dimopoulos MA, Rodolakis A, Antsaklis AS. Non-blood medical care in gynecologic oncology: a review and update of blood conservation management schemes. World J Surg Oncol 2011; 9: 142.
 
24.
Karcz R. Obrona pacjenta przed niechcianą transfuzją w praktyce sądowej. Prawo i Medycyna 2007; 4: 36-49.
 
25.
Lawry K, Slomka J, Goldfarb J. What went wrong: multiple perspectives on an adolescent’s decision to refuse blood transfusions. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1996; 35: 317-321.
 
26.
Curlin FA, Roach CJ, Gorawara-Bhat R, Lantos JD, Chin MH. When patients choose faith over medicine, physician perspectives on religiously related conflict in the medical encounter. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 88-91.
 
27.
Trzciński R, Kujawski R, Mik, Berut M, Dziki Ł, Dziki A. Surgery in Jehovah’s Witnesses – our experience. Prz Gastroenterol 2015; 10: 33-40.
 
28.
Ball A, Winstead P. Recombinant human erythropoietin therapy in critically ill Jehovah’s Witnesses. Pharmacotherapy 2011; 28: 1383-1390.
 
29.
Appellate Court in Łódź decision dated August 18 2013, I ACa 355/13, Łódź Appellate Court Decisions 2014; 1: 2.
 
30.
Ball AM, Winstead PS. Recombinant human erythropoietin therapy in critically ill Jehovah’s Witnesses. Pharmacotherapy 2008; 28: 1383-90.
 
31.
Appellate Court in Łódź decision dated August 18 2013, I ACa 355/13, Łódź Appellate Court Decisions 2014/1/2.
 
eISSN:2300-6722
ISSN:1899-1874
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top