ORIGINAL PAPER
The course of the professional development and the level of job satisfaction among physiotherapists
More details
Hide details
Submission date: 2014-08-20
Final revision date: 2015-01-14
Acceptance date: 2015-01-26
Publication date: 2015-03-24
Medical Studies 2015;31(1):26-34
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The occupation of a physiotherapist, due to its nature, is very challenging. It requires continuous work on oneself and the improvement of professional skills.
Aim of the research: To assess the level of competence, professional development, and job satisfaction among a group of active physiotherapists.
Material and methods: The study involved a group of 62 physiotherapists, among whom a questionnaire was conducted. The survey contained questions concerning demographic data of the respondents, general working conditions, and satisfaction with their profession. The calculations and graphs presented in the descriptive statistics, as well as the statistical hypotheses, were all performed in MS Excel’s spread sheet and T-Czuprow’s similarity rate.
Results: The results show the high activity concerning participation in specialised courses in physiotherapy methods and the use of specialised literature. The level of job satisfaction is high, at about 70%, in all groups. The character of the work and positive relations with co-workers and supervisors were assessed highest and salary and promotion opportunities lowest from all the determinants of job satisfaction. Although the level of job satisfaction itself is acceptable, nearly 1/3 of respondents have no plans for further development and 40% do not plan to follow this profession in the future.
Conclusions: After graduation they often willingly improve their professional qualifications. The level of job satisfaction itself is acceptable; however, the lack of plans for further development or willingness to follow this profession in the future can cause a significant decline in the number of professionally active physiotherapists.
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Rusin M. Wzór osobowy współczesnego fizjoterapeuty. Rehabilitacja Medyczna 2012; 3: 27-32.
2.
Lewandowski A, Sobolewski. Opinie studentek fizjoterapii z Bydgoszczy na temat znaczenia cech indywidualnych w realizacji przyszłego zawodu. Med Biol Sci 2007; 21: 55-62.
3.
Kwolek A. Rehabilitacja Medyczna. Elsevier Urban & Partner, Wroclaw 2003.
4.
Lewandowski A, Śmiglewska M, Smeja B. Właściwości indywidualne fizjoterapeuty w pomyślnej realizacji zawodu – na przykładzie wyników badań studentek kierunku fizjoterapii. Postępy Rehabilitacji 2010; 1: 13-9.
5.
Kiebzak W, Gieremek K, Florczyk M, et al. Kodeks etyczny fizjoterapeuty Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Fizjoterapia Polska 2009; 3: 266-72.
6.
Kowalska I. Wypalenie zawodowe wśród polskich fizjoterapeutów. Postępy Rehabilitacji 2011; 3: 43-52.
7.
Kamrowska A. Wypalenie zawodowe. Pol Merkur Lekarski 2007; 23: 317-9.
8.
Campo M, Weiser S, Koening K. Job strain in physical therapists. Phys Ther 2009; 89: 946-56.
9.
Śliwiński Z. Nie chcemy fizjoterapeutów z przypadku. Rehabilitacja w Praktyce 2006; 1: 8-9.
10.
.Baxter D. Boom na fizjoterapię. Rehabilitacja w Praktyce 2007; 1: 12-13.
11.
Starczyńska M, Karwacińska J, Stepanek-Finda B, et al. Historyczne podstawy fizjoterapii. Studia Medyczne 2011; 21: 71-7.
12.
Sandrom RW. The meanings of autonomy for physical therapy. Phys Ther 2007; 87: 98-110.
13.
Starczyńska M, Błaszkiewicz E, Kiebzak W, et al. Zawód fizjoterapeuty w opinii grupy zawodowej. Fizjoterapia Polska 2011; 3: 227-39.
14.
Gotlib J, Białoszewski D, Cabak A, et al. Postrzeganie zawodu fizjoterapeuty przez studentów I roku studiów I stopnia polskich uczelni o różnych profilach kształcenia. Fizjoterapia Polska 2009; 2: 109-21.
15.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York 2003.
16.
Sęk H. Wypalenie zawodowe. Przyczyny i zapobieganie. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw 2009.
17.
Cherniss C. Role of professional self-efficacy in the etiology and amelioration of burnout. In: Professional burnout: Recent Developments in theory and research. Schaufeli B, Maslach C, Marek T (eds.). Taylor and Francis, Washington DC 1993; 135-43.