Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
ORIGINAL PAPER
The impact of depression and anxiety symptoms on quality of life and social support in therapy with mechanical circulatory support devices: results for patients and their caregivers
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Health Science, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland
 
2
Department of Transplantology and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Krakow Specialist Hospital Tchem St. John Paul II, Krakow, Poland
 
3
Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantology Department, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2024-05-16
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-12-09
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-04-28
 
 
Publication date: 2025-12-18
 
 
Corresponding author
Irena Milaniak
Irena Milaniak Faculty of Health Science Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University Gustawa Herlinga-Grudzińskiego 1 30-705 Krakow, Poland
 
 
Medical Studies 2025;41(4):358-364
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is a therapy increasingly used in patients with advanced heart failure. Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) has the potential to improve patient’s quality of life (QoL) significantly and may appreciably impact psychological functioning and social support among patients and their caregivers.

Aim of the research:
Assessment of the impact of depression and anxiety symptoms on the QoL and social support in therapy with mechanical circulatory support devices among patients and their caregivers.

Material and methods:
The analysis included 54 dyads of patients (median age: 61 years; men 96.30%) and their caregivers (median age: 59 years; men 3.70%). Data were collected 3 months after LVAD implantation. The study used the questionnaires SF-12, Berlin Social Support Scales, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and sociodemographic data.

Results:
Caregivers of patients with LVAD assessed the QoL as better than patients (PCS 55.94 vs. 41.87; MCS 48.98 vs. 45.58). Significant differences were found in perceived social-emotional support, need for support, and support seeking. Patients had a higher level of this support. Patients had higher levels of depression and anxiety symptoms than their caregivers. Among patients, depression and anxiety symptoms hurt the mental domain of QoL and the perceived protective buffering of emotional support. Among caregivers, higher intensity of anxiety was associated with a greater need for protective buffering support and a lower need for perceived instrumental support. Predictors of QoL for patients included time since LVAD implantation, depression, and type of device, while among caregivers – age, time since LVAD implantation, and professional activity.

Conclusions:
Psychological monitoring and the availability of support during care for the patient and caregiver are recommended.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Writing Committee Members, ACC/AHA Joint Committee Members. AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. J Card Fail. 2022; 28: e1-e167.
 
2.
McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, Burri H, Butler J, Čelutkienė J, Chion- cel O, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farma- kis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam CSP, Lyon AR, McMurray JJV, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Piepo- li MF, Price S, Rosano GMC, Ruschitzka F, Skibelund AK; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42: 3599-3726.
 
3.
Sandau KE, Lee CS, Faulkner KM, Pozehl B, Eckman P, Garberich R, Weaver CE, Joseph SM, Hall S, Carey SA, Chaudhry SP, Schroeder SE, Hoffman RO, Feldman D, Birati EY, Soni M, Marble JF, Jurgens CY, Hoglund B, Cowger JA. Health-related Quality of Life in Patients with a Left Ventricular Assist Device (QOLVAD) Questionnaire: initial psychometrics of a new instrument. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021; 36(2): 172-184.
 
4.
Sandau KE, Hoglund BA, Weaver CE, Boisjolie C, Feldman D. A conceptual definition of quality of life with a left ventricular assist device: results from a qualitative study. Heart Lung. 2014; 43(1): 32-40.
 
5.
Kato NP, Okada I, Kagami Y, Endo M, Hatano M, Ono M, Jaarsma T, Kinugawa K. Quality of life of family caregivers of patients with a left ventricular assist device in Japan. J Cardiol. 2018; 71(1): 81-87.
 
6.
Feldman D, Pamboukian SV, Teuteberg JJ, Birks E, Lietz K, Moore SA, Morgan JA, Arabia F, Bauman ME, Buch- holz HW, Deng M, Dickstein ML, El-Banayosy A, Elliot T, Goldstein DJ, Grady KL, Jones K, Hryniewicz K, John R, Kaan A, Kusne S, Loebe M, Massicotte MP, Moazami N, Mohacsi P, Mooney M, Nelson T, Pagani F, Perry W, Potapov EV, Rame JE, Russell SD, Sorensen EN, Sun B, Strue- ber M, Mangi AA, Petty MG, Rogers J; International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: executive summary. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013; 32: 157-187.
 
7.
Kirkpatrick JN, Kellom K, Hull SC, Henderson R, Singh J, Coyle LA, Mountis M, Shore ED, Petrucci R, Cronholm PF, Barg FK. Caregivers and left ventricular assist devices as a destination, not a journey. J Card Fail. 2015; 21: 806-815.
 
8.
Ferrario SR, Panzeri A, Pistono M. Psychological difficulties of LVAD patients and caregivers: a follow up over one year from discharge. Artif Organs. 2022; 46(3):479-490.
 
9.
Magid M, Jones J, Allen LA, McIlvennan CK, Magid K, Sterling JA, Matlock DD. The perceptions of important elements of caregiving for a left ventricular assist device patient: a qualitative metasynthesis. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016; 31: 215-225.
 
10.
Dew MA, DiMartini AF, Dobbels F, Grady KL, Jowsey-Gregoire SG, Kaan A, Kendall K, Young QR, Abbey SE, Butt Z, Crone CC, De Geest S, Doligalski CT, Kugler C, McDonald L, Ohler L, Painter L, Petty MG, Robson D, Schlöglhofer T, Zimbrean PC. The 2018 ISHLT/APM/AST/ICCAC/STSW recommendations for the psychosocial evaluation of adult cardiothoracic transplant candidates and candidates for long-term mechanical circulatory support. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018; 37(7): 803-823.
 
11.
Abshire M, Russell SD, Davidson PM, Budhathoki C, Han HR, Grady KL, Desai S, Himmelfatb CD. Social support moderates the relationship between perceived stress and quality of life in patients with a left ventricular assist device. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018; 33(5): E1-E9.
 
12.
Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996; 34(3): 220-233.
 
13.
Nezlek JB, Rusanowska M, Holas P, Krejtz I. The factor structure of a Polish language version of the hospital anxiety depression scale (HADS). Curr Psychol. 2021; 40: 2318-2326.
 
14.
Luszczynska A, Kowalska M, Mazurkiewicz M, Schwarzer R. Berlin Social Support Scales (BSSS): Polish version of BSSS and preliminary results on its psychometric properties. Psychol Stud. 2006; 44(3): 17-27.
 
15.
Arnold SV, Jones PG, Allen LA, Cohen DJ, Fendler TJ, Holtz JE, Aggarwal S, Spertus JA. Frequency of poor outcome (death or poor quality of life) after left ventricular assist device for destination therapy: results from the INTERMACS Registry. Circulation. Heart Fail. 2016; 9(8): 10.
 
16.
Modica M, Minotti A, De Maria R, Scaglione A, Bordoni B, Cipriani M, Russo C, Racca V, Ferratini M. Coping, mood, quality of life, and outcomes in recipients of left ventricular assist devices: a cluster analysis. Psychosom Med. 2019; 81(2): 192-199.
 
17.
Schmalz G, Binner C, Eisner M, Wagner J, Rast J, Kottmann T, Haak R, Lehmann S, Borger MA, Garbade J, Ziebolz D. Oral health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure and left ventricular assist devices – results of a cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Inves 2021; 25: 5879-5887.
 
18.
Suzuki F, Sato H, Akiyama M, Akiba M, Adachi O, Harada T, Saiki Y, Kohzuki M. Changes in the quality of life of patients with left ventricular assist device and their caregivers in Japan: retrospective observational study. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2022; 257(1): 45-55.
 
19.
Modica M, Ferratini M, Torri A, Oliva F, Martinelli L, De Maria R, Frigerio M. Quality of life and emotional distress early after left ventricular assist device implant: a mixed-method study. Artif Organs. 2015; 39(3): 220-227.
 
20.
Jesus CM, Martha A, Bidisha G, James YJ. The relationship of anxiety, depression, and quality of life in adults with left ventricular assist devices. ASAIO J. 2018; 64(4): 515-520.
 
21.
Saeed D, Feldman D, Banayosy AE, Birks E, Blume E, Cowger J, Hayward C, Jorde U, Kremer J, MacGowan G, Maltais S, Maybaum S, Mehra M, Shah KB, Mohacsi P, Schweiger M, Schroeder SE, Shah P, Slepian M, Tops LF, D’Alessandro D. The 2023 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: a 10- year update. J Heart Lung Transpl. 2023; 42(7): e1-e222.
 
22.
Levelink M, Levke Brütt A. Factors influencing health-related quality of life of patients with a left ventricular assist device: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021; 20(8): 803-815.
 
23.
Spielmann H, Albert W, Semmig-Könze S, Lauenroth V, Spitz-Köberich C, Staus P, Tigges-Limmer K, Kugler C; SELMA Study Group. High level of psychosocial adjustment in patients on ongoing ventricular assist device support in the years one to three after VAD implantation-A national multi-center Study. Heart Lung. 2024; 63: 92-97.
 
24.
Melendo-Viu M, Dobarro D, Raposeiras Roubin S, Llamas Pernas C, Moliz Cordón C, Vazquez Lamas M, Piñón Esteban M, Varela Martínez MÁ, Abu Assi E, Pita Romero R, Legarra Calderón JJ, Íñiguez Romo A. Left ventricular assist device as a destination therapy: current situation and the importance of patient selection. Life. 2023; 13(4): 1065.
 
eISSN:2300-6722
ISSN:1899-1874
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top