ORIGINAL PAPER
Understanding of human death by Polish specialist physicians
1
Department of Internal Medicine and Internal Medicine in Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Special Needs Pedagogy and Resocialisation, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
3
Department of Orthodox Theology, Faculty of Theology, The John Paul II Catholic University, Lublin, Poland
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2023-11-13
Final revision date: 2024-03-11
Acceptance date: 2024-03-20
Publication date: 2024-06-29
Corresponding author
Bożena Baczewska
Prof. Bożena Baczewska Department of Internal Medicine and Internal Medicine in Nursing
Prof. Bożena Baczewska Department of Internal Medicine and Internal Medicine in Nursing
Medical Studies 2024;40(2):157-169
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
All over the world it has been accepted that the legal classification of death, and thus the actual death of a human being, is based on brain death. But one must take into account that the process of the clarification of neurological criteria is still ongoing. Medical, bioethical, psychological, and thanatopedagogical scholars debate in order to draw a precise line between the life and death of a human being.
Aim of the research:
Due to the social importance of the thanatological topic, a survey was conducted to learn the opinions of specialist physicians on their understanding of human death in relation to the Polish legal and medical regulations in the area.
Material and methods:
The study involved 109 specialist physicians employed in various medical centres in Poland. An original questionnaire prepared for this purpose was used to examine the understanding of human death in light of the legal and medical acts that came into force between 2007 and 2019.
Results and conclusions:
The study reveals that 12.94% of specialist physicians feel that they can fully and correctly identify the basis for declaring a patient dead after diagnosing the irreversible cessation of brain function, while 57.80% of all respondents understand death in accordance with the legal acts currently in force in Poland. In addition, 72.48% of the study participants indicated that irreversible loss of consciousness is not adequate grounds for determining a patient’s death, while 56.89% felt that brain death is equal to the biological death of a human being.
All over the world it has been accepted that the legal classification of death, and thus the actual death of a human being, is based on brain death. But one must take into account that the process of the clarification of neurological criteria is still ongoing. Medical, bioethical, psychological, and thanatopedagogical scholars debate in order to draw a precise line between the life and death of a human being.
Aim of the research:
Due to the social importance of the thanatological topic, a survey was conducted to learn the opinions of specialist physicians on their understanding of human death in relation to the Polish legal and medical regulations in the area.
Material and methods:
The study involved 109 specialist physicians employed in various medical centres in Poland. An original questionnaire prepared for this purpose was used to examine the understanding of human death in light of the legal and medical acts that came into force between 2007 and 2019.
Results and conclusions:
The study reveals that 12.94% of specialist physicians feel that they can fully and correctly identify the basis for declaring a patient dead after diagnosing the irreversible cessation of brain function, while 57.80% of all respondents understand death in accordance with the legal acts currently in force in Poland. In addition, 72.48% of the study participants indicated that irreversible loss of consciousness is not adequate grounds for determining a patient’s death, while 56.89% felt that brain death is equal to the biological death of a human being.
REFERENCES (56)
1.
Grof S, Halifax J. The Human Encounter With Death. E.P. Dutton: New York, NY, USA 1977; 1.
2.
Albinus L. The House of Hades. Studies in Ancient Greek Eschatology. Aarhus University Press, Oxford, UK, 2000.
3.
Aries P. Western Attitudes toward DEATH: From the Middle Ages to the Present. Marion Boyars: London, UK, 1976.
4.
Long AG. Death and Immortality in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2019.
5.
Cholbi M, Timmerman T (eds.). Exploring the Philosophy of Death and Dying. Classical and Contemporary Perspectives. Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2021.
8.
Alexander I. Humility before new scientific evidence: we no longer have moral certainty that “brain death” is true death. Linacre Q. 2019; 86(4): 314-326.
9.
Austriaco NPG. In defense of the loss of bodily integrity as a criterion for death: a response to the radical capacity argument. The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review 2009; 73(4): 647-659.
10.
Brugger EC. Are brain dead individuals dead? grounds for reasonable doubt. J Med Philos. 2016; 41(3): 329-350.
11.
De Mattei R (ed.). Finis Vitae. Is “Brain Death” True Death?. Life Guardian Foudation: Oregon, OH, USA, 2009.
12.
Lock M. Inventing a new death and making it believable. Anthropol Med. 2002; 9(2): 97-115.
13.
Youngner SJ, Arnold RM. Philosophical debates about the definition of death: who cares? J Med Philos. 2001 Oct; 26(5): 527-537.
14.
Condic ML. Determination of death: a scientific perspective on biological integration. J Med Philos. 2016; 41(3): 257-278.
15.
Obayashi H (ed.). Death and Afterlife. Perspectives of World Religions. Praeger Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1992.
16.
Daley BE. The Hope of the Early Church. A Handbook of Patristic Eschatology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1991.
17.
Moltmann J. The Coming of God. Christian Eschatology (Margaret Kohl, Trans.). SCM Press: London, UK, 1996.
18.
Ratzinger J. Eschatology. Death and Eternal Life (Michael Waldstein, Trans.). The Catholic University of America Press: Washington, D.C, USA, 1988.
19.
Ware K. ‘Go Joyfully’: The Mystery of Death and Resurrection. In: Beyond Death. Theological and Philosophical Reflections on Life after Death. D Cohn-Sherbok, C Lewis (eds.). Macmillan Press: London, UK, 1995; 27-41.
20.
Bartlett ET. Differences between death and dying. J Med Ethics. 1995; 21(5): 270-276.
21.
Kass LR. Death as an event: a commentary on Robert Morison. Science (New York, N.Y.) 1971; 173(3998): 698-702.
22.
Morison RS. Death: process or event?. Science (New York, N.Y.) 1971; 173(3998): 694-698.
23.
Bacigalupo F, Huerta D, Montefusco-Siegmund R. The debate about death: an imperishable discussion? Biol Res. 2007; 40(4): 523-534.
24.
De Georgia MA. History of brain death as death: 1968 to the present. J Crit Care. 2014; 29(4): 673-678.
25.
Veatch RM, Ross LF. Defining Death: The Case for Choice. Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2016.
26.
Bernat JL, Culver CM, Gert B. On the definition and criterion of death. Ann Intern Med. 1981; 94(3): 389-394.
27.
Wijdicks EF. The diagnosis of brain death. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(16): 1215-1221.
28.
Bernat JL. A defense of the whole-brain concept of death. Hastings Cent Rep. 1998; 28(2): 14-23.
29.
Truog RD, Miller FG. Brain death: justifications and critique. Clinical Ethics 2021; 7(3): 128-132.
30.
Youngner SJ, Arnold RM, DeVita MA. When is “dead”? Hastings Cent Rep. 1999; 29(6): 14-21.
31.
Gostin LO. Legal and ethical responsibilities following brain death: the McMath and Muńoz cases. JAMA 2014; 311(9): 903-904.
32.
Shah SK, Truog RD, Miller FG. Death and legal fictions. J Med Ethics. 2011; 37(12): 719-722.
33.
Spaemann R. Is brain death the death of a human person. Communio 2011; 38(2): 326-340.
34.
Truog RD, Miller FG. Changing the conversation about brain death. Am J Bioeth. 2014; 14(8): 9-14.
35.
Leśniewski K, Antoszewska B, Baczewska B. Attitudes of Polish Doctors towards Brain Death. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(21): 13729.
36.
Lewis A, Cahn-Fuller K, Caplan A. Shouldn’t dead be dead? The search for a uniform definition of death. J Law Med Ethics. 2017; 45(1): 112-128.
37.
Leśniewski K, Baczewska B, Antoszewska B. The understanding of human death by polish early career pre-specialist physicians. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(24): 16573.
38.
Notice of the Minister of Health of 17 July 2007 on the Criteria and Method of Determining the Permanent Irreversible Cessation of the Brain Function, based on Art. 9 sec. 3 of the “Cell, Tissue and Organ Recovery, Storage and Transplantation Act of 1 July 2005” (Dz.U./Journal of Laws/No. 169 item 1411).
39.
Notice of the Minister of Health of 4 December 2019 on the Manner and Criteria for Determining the Permanent Irreversible Cessation of Brain Function, having its legal basis in Art. 43a sec. 3 point 1 of the “Act of 5 December 1996 on the Professions of Doctor and Dentist” (Dz.U./Journal of Laws/of 2019, item 537, 577, 730 and 1590).
40.
Montreal Forum Report. International Guidelines for the Determination of Death – Phase I. Canada Blood Services: Ottawa, ON, Canada 2012, p. 31.
41.
Veatch RM. The death of whole-brain death: the plague of the disaggregators, somaticists, and mentalists. J Med Philos. 2005; 30(4): 353-378.
42.
Shewmon DA. Recovery from “brain death”: a neurologist’s apologia. Linacre Q. 1997; 64(1): 30-96.
43.
Furton EJ. Brain death, the soul, and organic life. Natl Cathol Bioeth Q. 2002; 2(3): 455-470.
44.
Beecher HK. After the ‘definition of irreversible coma’. N Engl J Med. 1969; 281: 1070-1071.
45.
Beecher HK, Dorr HI. The new definition of death. Some opposing views. Int Z Klin Pharmakol Ther Toxikol. 1971; 5(2): 120-124.
46.
Knaup M. Unity of Body and Soul or Mind-Brain-Being. Towards a Paradigm Shift in Modern Concepts of Personhood. J.B. Metzler Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany, 2018.
47.
Trimble MR. The Soul in the Brain. Johns Hopkins Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2007.
48.
Austriaco NPG. A philosophical assessment of TK’s autopsy report: implications for the debate over the brain death criteria. Linacre Q. 2016; 83(2): 192-202.
49.
Lee P. Total brain death and the integration of the body required of a human being. J Med Philos. 2016; 41(3): 300-314.
50.
Moschella M. Integrated but not whole? Applying an ontological account of human organismal unity to the brain death debate. Bioethics. 2016; 30(8): 550-556.
51.
Shewmon AD. The brain and somatic integration: insights into the standard biological rationale for equating “brain death” with death. J Med Philos. 2001; 26(5): 457-478.
52.
Napier S. Brain death, souls, and integrated functioning: reply to Verheijde and Potts. Christ Bioeth. 2013; 19(1): 25-39.
53.
Verheijde JL, Potts M. Commentary on the concept of brain death within the Catholic bioethical framework. Christ Bioeth. 2010; 16(3): 246-256.
54.
Machado C. Consciousness as a definition of death: its appeal and complexity. Clin Electroencephalogr. 1999; 30(4): 156-164.
55.
Shewmon DA. Brain death: a conclusion in search of a justification. Hastings Cent Rep. 2018; 48 Suppl 4: S22-S25.
56.
Greer DM, Shemie SD, Lewis A, Torrance S, Varelas P, Goldenberg FD, Bernat JL, Souter M, Topcuoglu MA, Alexandrov AW, Baldisseri M, Bleck T, Citerio G, Dawson R, Hoppe A, Jacobe S, Manara A, Nakagawa TA, Pope TM, Silvester W, Thomson D, Al Rahma H, Badenes R, Ba- ker AJ, Cerny V, Chang C, Chang TR, Gnedovskaya E, Han MK, Honeybul S, Jimenez E, Kuroda Y, Liu G, Mal- lick UK, Marquevich V, Mejia-Mantilla J, Piradov M, Quayyum S, Shrestha GS, Su YY, Timmons SD, Tei-telbaum J, Videtta W, Zirpe K, Sung G. Determination of brain death/death by neurologic criteria: the world brain death project. JAMA 2020; 324(11): 1078-1097.
| eISSN: | 2300-6722 |
| ISSN: | 1899-1874 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
