Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
ORIGINAL PAPER
Cerebral palsy – preschool and school education from the perspective of a social model of disability
 
More details
Hide details
1
Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
 
2
Department Developmental Neurology and Epileptology, Institute of Polish Mother’s Health Center, Lodz, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2023-08-22
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-10-09
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-11-24
 
 
Publication date: 2023-12-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Agata Michalska
Agata Michalska PhD Collegium Medicum Jan Kochanowski University Kielce, Poland
 
 
Medical Studies 2023;39(4):352-358
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Inclusive education has been implemented in European countries in recent decades. It involves supporting the education of children with disabilities in mainstream schools to build an inclusive society. Cerebral palsy (CP) is a condition characterized by persistent motor disorders often accompanied by sensory, cognitive, communication, perceptual, behavioural, epilepsy, and secondary musculoskeletal problems. The nature and severity of disabilities can influence the choice of educational setting. For mainstream schools, the presence of a student with CP with mobility problems, speech, or sensory disorders, is a challenge. The presence of such a student at the lesson forces the use of special methods of work.

Aim of the research:
To assess the prevalence of inclusive education among children and adolescents with CP as a factor influencing social participation.

Material and methods:
The study included a group of 205 patients diagnosed with CP aged 0–18 years. Classification systems such as GMFCS, MACS, and CFCS were used in the study.

Results and conclusions:
The presence of associated disabilities, excluding intellectual disabilities, was found in 79% of the participants. The presence of one disability was observed in 34% of the participants, 2 disabilities in 25%, and 3 disabilities in 17% of the participants. Significant associations were found between the type of school, CP subtype, intellectual disability, and levels of functioning in terms of mobility, fine motor skills, and communication (p < 0.001). In total, 23% of the participants attended mainstream schools, and 13% attended inclusive schools. Inclusion of children with CP in mainstream schools was mainly limited to students with normal cognitive functions (IQ ≥ 70).
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M, Damiano D, Dan B, Jacobsson B. The definition and classification of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007; 109: 8-14.
 
2.
Stadskleiv K. Cognitive functioning in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2020; 62: 283-289.
 
3.
Stadskleiv K, Jahnsen R, Andersen GL, von Tetzchner S. Neuropsychological profiles of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Neurorehabil 2018; 21: 108-120.
 
4.
Kowalski MH. Uczniowie niepełnosprawni w polskim szkolnictwie powszechnym. Kwartalnik Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Społecznego Studia i Prace 2014; 3: 92-107.
 
5.
Konarska P. Kształcenie osób niepełnosprawnych w świetle aktualnych regulacji prawnych. Forum Prawnicze 2014; 5: 42-57.
 
6.
Lebeer J. It is a long road to inclusive education for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2018; 60: 336-337.
 
7.
Twardowski A. Controversies around the social model of disability. Culture – Society – Education 2019; 2: 7-21.
 
8.
Ramberg J, Watkins A. Exploring inclusive education across Europe: some insights from the European agency statistics on inclusive Education. Forum for International Research in Education 2020: 6: 85-101.
 
9.
Palisano RJ, Rosenbaum P, Bartlett D, Livingston MH. Content validity of the expanded and revised Gross Motor Function Classification System. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008; 50: 744-750.
 
10.
Eliasson AC, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Rösblad B, Beckung E, Arner M, Ohrvall AM, Rosenbaum P. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006; 48: 49-54.
 
11.
Hidecker MJ, Paneth N, Rosenbaum PL, Kent RD, Lillie J, Eulenberg JB, Chester K Jr, Johnson B, Michalsen L, Evatt M, Taylor K. Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System for individuals with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2011; 53: 704-710.
 
12.
Sentenac M, Ehlinger V, Michelsen SI, Marcelli M, Dickinson HO, Arnaud C. Determinants of inclusive education of 8-12 year-old children with cerebral palsy in 9 European regions. Res Dev Disabil 2013; 34: 588-595.
 
13.
Jones H, Carter B, Bethan J, Collins H, Wang T, Rees S, Kemp A, Paranjothy S. Educational outcomes of children with cerebral palsy. Int J Popul Data Sci 2019; 4: 092.
 
14.
Gillies MB, Bowen JR, Patterson JA, Roberts CL, Torvaldsen S. Educational outcomes for children with cerebral palsy: a linked data cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2018; 60: 397-401.
 
15.
Santos LHC, Grisotto KP, Rodrigues DCB. Bruck I School inclusion of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: is this possible for all of them in our days? Rev Paul Pediatr 2011; 29: 314-319.
 
16.
Moll I, Voorman JM, Ketelaar M, van Schie PE, Gorter JW, Lequin MH, de Vries LS, Vermeulen RJ. Prognostic value of brain abnormalities for cognitive functioning in cerebral palsy: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2021; 32: 56-65.
 
17.
Fluss J, Lidzba K. Cognitive and academic profiles in children with cerebral palsy: a narrative review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2020; 63: 447-456.
 
18.
Hidecker MJ, Ho NT, Dodge N, Hurvitz EA, Slaughter J, Workinger MS, Kent RD, Rosenbaum P, Lenski M, Messaros BM, Vanderbeek SB, Deroos S, Paneth N. Inter-relationships of functional status in cerebral palsy: analyzing gross motor function, manual ability, and communication function classification systems in children. Dev Med Child Neurol 2012; 54: 737-742.
 
eISSN:2300-6722
ISSN:1899-1874
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top