Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
ORIGINAL PAPER
Economic and social factors and the quality of nutrition of pregnant women
 
 
More details
Hide details
 
Publication date: 2013-08-05
 
 
Medical Studies 2013;29(2):160-166
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The level of education and the social-and-economical status, connected with the amount of income, are some of the factors which decide in a significant way on the manner of a person’s nutrition. However, not much research has been carried out concerning the influence of these factors on the nutrition of pregnant women.
Aim of the research: To assess the manner of nutrition of pregnant women depending on the level of education and financial resources required to buy the necessary food.
Material and methods: Seven hundred and four pregnant women took part in the research. Information about social variables and the frequency of consumption of selected products and beverages, and intake of folic acid and other supplements was obtained using an anonymous questionnaire.
Results: Women with the highest level of education consumed the most fruit, vegetables, milk and dairy products, saltwater fish and wholegrain foods in comparison to women with lower education; whereas they drank sweetened soft drinks less frequently. More frequent use of folic acid and other vitamin and/or mineral supplements was also connected with a higher level of education. 15.4% of pregnant women declared no sufficient financial resources to buy the necessary food. This factor was connected in a significant way to lower consumption of fruit, vegetables, products providing animal protein, milk and dairy products, saltwater fish, wholegrain products, and vitamin and/or mineral supplements.
Conclusions: A lower quality of diet of pregnant women was connected both to the low level of education and the insufficient financial resources for buying the necessary food. Women with higher education, even if they had low income, chose products more consistent with the principles of proper nutrition, which confirms the positive influence of awareness and greater knowledge on their nutrition.
REFERENCES (25)
1.

Oken E, Kleinman K, Olsen S et al. Associations of seafood and elongated n-3 fatty acid intake with fetal growth and length of gestation: results from a US pregnancy cohort. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 160: 774–783.
 
2.

Mikkelsen TB, Osler M, Orozova-Bekkevold I et al. Association between fruit and vegetable consumption and birth weight: a prospective study among 43,585 Danish women. Scand J Publ Health 2006; 34: 616–622.
 
3.

Rodríguez-Bernal CL, Rebagliato M, Ińiguez C et al. Diet quality in early pregnancy and its effects on fetal growth outcomes: the Infancia y Medio Ambiente (Childhood and Environment) Mother and Child Cohort Study in Spain. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 91: 1659–1666.
 
4.

Thompson JMD, Wall C, Becroft DMO et al. Maternal dietary patterns in pregnancy and the association with small-for-gestational-age infants. Br J Nutr 2010; 9: 1–9.
 
5.

Heppe DH, van Dam RM, Willemsen SP et al. Maternal milk consumption, fetal growth, and the risks of neonatal complications: the Generation R Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 94: 501–509.
 
6.

Godfrey KM, Barker DJP. Fetal nutrition and adult disease. Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 71 Suppl: 1344–1352.
 
7.

Waśkiewicz A, Sygnowska E, Szcześniewska D. Impact of educational level on the dietary pattern in randomly selected population groups over 10-years of observation – Pol-MONICA Warsaw Study. Pol J Hum Nutr Metab 2000; 27: 219–237.
 
8.

Hulshof KFAM, Brussaard JH, Kruizinga AG et al. Socio-economic status, dietary intake and 10 y trends: the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003; 57: 128–137.
 
9.

Sekuła W, Figurska K, Barysz A et al. Income inequalities and their effect on the distribution of the fruit and vegetable consumption in Poland. Pol J Hum Nutr Metab 2004; 35: 14–23.
 
10.

Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Does social class predict diet quality? Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 87: 1107–1117.
 
11.

.Bodnar LM, Siega-Riz A. A Diet Quality Index for Pregnancy detects variation in diet and differences by sociodemographic factors. Pub Health Nutr 2002; 5: 801–809.
 
12.

.Sontrop JM, Campell MK, Evers SE et al. Fish consumption among pregnant women in London, Ontario: associations with socio-demographic and health and lifestyle factors. Can J Pub Health 2007; 98: 389–394.
 
13.

Northstone K, Emmett P, Rogers I. Dietary patterns in pregnancy and associations with sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. Eur J Clin Nutr 2008; 62: 471–479.
 
14.

.Rifas-Shiman SL, Rich-Edwards J, Kleinman K et al. Dietary quality during pregnancy varies by maternal characteristics in Project Viva: a US cohort. J Am Diet Assoc 2009; 109: 1004–1011.
 
15.

Suliga E. Nutritional behaviours of pregnant women. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabet Metab 2011; 17: 76–81.
 
16.

Fowles ER, Bryant M, Kim SH. Predictors of dietary quality in low-income pregnant women: a path analysis. Nurs Res 2011; 60: 286–294.
 
17.

Szostak-Węgierek D, Cichocka A. Żywienie kobiet w ciąży. Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL, Warszawa 2005.
 
18.

Borkowski W, Mielniczuk H. Wpływ wybranych czynników społecznych i zdrowotnych, w tym tempa przyrostu masy ciała w ciąży i masy przed ciążą, na małą masę urodzeniową noworodka. Ginekol Pol 2008; 79: 415–421.
 
19.

Skagerstróm J, Chang G, Nilsen P. Predictors of drinking during pregnancy: a systematic review. J Women’s Health 2011; 20: 901–913.
 
20.

Ebrahimi F, Shariff ZM, Rezaeian M et al. Socioeconomic status and intake of energy and sodium are associated with calcium intake among pregnant women in Rafsanjan city, Iran. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013; 39: 146–153.
 
21.

Aggarwal A, Monsivais P, Drewnowski A. Nutrient intakes linked to better health outcomes are associated with higher diet costs in the US. PLoS One 2012; 7: e37533.
 
22.

Monsivais P, Aggarwal A, Drewnowski A. Are socio-economic disparities in diet quality explained by diet cost?.
 
23.
J Epidemiol Community Health 2012; 66: 530–535.
 
24.

Ubóstwo w Polsce w 2010 r. (na podstawie badania bu¬dżetów gospodarstw domowych). Główny Urząd Statys¬tyczny 2011.
 
25.

Jeżewska-Zychowicz M. Zachowania żywieniowe i ich uwarunkowania. Wydawnictwo SGGW, Warszawa 2004.
 
eISSN:2300-6722
ISSN:1899-1874
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top