Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Rethinking anatomy education for Generation Z: insights from Polish nursing students on learning needs and preferences
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Human Anatomy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
 
2
Department of Normal Anatomy, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
 
3
Department of Education and Research of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
 
4
Department of Medical Biology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2025-11-06
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-01-13
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-02-16
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-07-07
 
 
Corresponding author
Małgorzata Witkowska-Zimny   

Medical University of Warsaw
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
How to adapt teaching methods and strategies to the needs of Generation Z is an immense challenge for medical educators. Hence, we are interested in exploring the topic of learning anatomy from the students’ perspective. In our study, we have asked nursing students about their needs and expectations regarding anatomy classes.

Aim of the research:
This study aimed to explore how anatomy teaching methods can be adapted to the needs of Generation Z and to inform the discussion on undergraduate nursing anatomy education.

Material and methods:
A cross-sectional study involving Polish first-year nursing students was carried out at two biggest medical universities in Poland. Data were collected using an original questionnaire designed based on the review of the literature and a focus group discussion among authors. Students’ opinions at the beginning and after completing the anatomy course were compared.

Results and conclusions:
Despite using digital tools, students valued traditional teaching methods. After the anatomy course, support grew for structured learning with pre-class preparation and frequent in-class assessments. Preferences shifted toward integrating anatomy with related subjects and extending course duration, while emphasising consolidation with a group of basic subjects like physiology, morphology, and histology. There is much debate over suitable methods of delivering anatomical knowledge. Changing anatomy education for Generations Z and Alpha is one of the conditions for successfully training, and retaining nursing students. Engaged teachers, face-to-face learning, and hands-on, practical classes cannot simply be replaced by technology.
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Regulation of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of October 10, 2024. (https://dziennikustaw.gov.pl/D...).
 
2.
Shin M, Prasad A, Sabo G, Macnow ASR, Sheth NP, Cross MB, Premkumar A. Anatomy education in US Medical Schools: before, during, and beyond COVID-19. BMC Med Educ. 2022; 22: 103.
 
3.
Pagels L, Eschke RC, Luedtke K. Effectiveness of digital and analog learning methods for learning anatomical structures in physiotherapy education. BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24: 500.
 
4.
Singer L, Evans L, Zahra D, Agbeja I, Moyes S. Fostering engagement in virtual anatomy learning for healthcare students. BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24: 414.
 
5.
James S, D’Amore A, Thomas T. Learning preferences of first-year nursing and midwifery students: utilising VARK. Nurse Educ Today. 2011; 31: 417-423.
 
6.
Burne-Johnston AN, McAllister M. Back to the future with hands-on science: students’ perceptions of learning anatomy and physiology. J Nurs Educ. 2008; 47: 417-421.
 
7.
Hernandez JE, Vasan N, Huff S, Melovitz-Vasan C. Learning styles/preferences among medical students: kinesthetic learner’s multimodal approach to learning anatomy. Med Sci Educ. 2020; 30: 1633-1638.
 
8.
Padmalatha K, Kumar JP, Shamanewadi AN. Do learning styles influence learning outcomes in anatomy in first-year medical students. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022; 11: 2971-2976.
 
9.
Manchester KR, Roberts D. From classroom to clinic: Bridging the gap in nursing anatomy and physiology education. Nurse Educ Pract. 2024; 75: 103870.
 
10.
Cornwall J, Hildebrandt S, Champney TH, Goodman K. Ethical concerns surrounding artificial intelligence in anatomy education: Should AI human body simulations replace donors in the dissection room? Anat Sci Educ. 2024; 17: 937-943.
 
11.
Neri I, Cercenelli L, Marcuccio M, Lodi S, Koufi F-D, Fazio A, Marvi MV, Marcelli E, Billi AM, Ruggeri A, Tarsitano A, Manzoli L, Badiali G, Ratti S. Dissecting human anatomy learning process through anatomical education with augmented reality: AEducAR 2.0, an updated interdisciplinary study. Anat Sci Educ. 2024; 17: 693-711.
 
12.
Dove E, Hennessy K, Kirou-Mauro A, Aitkens L, Duncan A, Agur A, Ho ES. Gross and applied anatomy pedagogical approaches in occupational therapy education: a scoping review. Can J Occup Ther. 2024; 91(2): 136-148.
 
13.
Beresheim A, Zepeda D, Pharel M, Soy T, Wilson AB, Ferrigno C. Anatomy’s missing faces: an assessment of representation gaps in atlas and textbook imagery. Anat Sci Educ. 2024; 17: 1055-1070.
 
14.
Gangata H, Vigurs K. Pedagogical principles used by anatomy teachers to facilitate the teaching and learning of anatomy to physiotherapy undergraduates in the United Kingdom. Clin Anat. 2023; 36: 795-808.
 
15.
Hall TR, Mosley CF, Balta JY. Graduate anatomy education: How are we training the future generations of anatomy educators? Anat Sci Educ. 2024; 17: 422-432.
 
16.
Xiao J. Improving student learning and performance through a continuous flipped anatomy teaching model. Anat Sci Educ. 2024; 17: 219-226.
 
17.
Longhurst GJ, Bazira PJ, Finn GM. Student’s perspectives of inclusive practices in anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ. 2024; 17: 571-590.
 
18.
Kumar R, Singh R. Model pedagogy of human anatomy in medical education. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020; 42: 355-365.
 
eISSN:2300-6722
ISSN:1899-1874
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top