Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
REVIEW PAPER
How does EGFR overexpression affect the development and treatment of rectal cancer?
 
More details
Hide details
 
Submission date: 2018-11-18
 
 
Final revision date: 2018-12-17
 
 
Acceptance date: 2018-12-18
 
 
Publication date: 2018-12-31
 
 
Medical Studies 2018;34(4):337-341
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulates the proliferation of many different types of cells and plays an important role in the formation and growth of tumours. The interaction of EGF with cells is possible by the EGF receptor (EGFR) anchored in the cell membrane. Excess EGFR expression is found in approximately 25–82% of colorectal cancer cases. Attachment of EGF to EGFR results in a conformational change in the receptor, an increase in affinity for neighbouring receptors, receptor dimerisation, and activation of tyrosine kinase in the intraplasmic domain. Activation of EGFR leads to the initiation of the signal transduction pathway to the cell nucleus, via a number of proteins with enzymatic activity – secondary messengers, including KRAS and BRAF proteins. The assessment of the presence of mutations in the KRAS gene has become a standard element in the qualification of patients with advanced colorectal cancer for therapy with the use of monoclonal antibodies.
REFERENCES (11)
1.
Neumann JH, Jung A, Kirchner T. Molecular pathology of colorectal cancer. Pathologe 2015; 36: 137-44.
 
2.
Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell 1990; 61: 759-67.
 
3.
Shan L, Li M, Ma J, Zhang H. PCR-based assays versus direct sequencing for evaluating the effect of KRAS status on anti-EGFR treatment response in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9: e107926.
 
4.
Caiazza F, Elliott L, Fennelly D, Sheahan K, Doherty GA, Ryan EJ. Targeting EGFR in metastatic colorectal cancer beyond the limitations of KRAS status: alternative biomarkers and therapeutic strategies. Biomark Med 2015; 9: 363-75.
 
5.
Cervantes A. Exploring better strategies for EGFR antibodies in colon cancer. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 549-50.
 
6.
De Stefano A, Carlomagno C. Beyond KRAS: predictive factors of the efficacy of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 9732-43.
 
7.
Douillard JY. Panitumumab – FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Eng J Med 2013; 369: 1023-34.
 
8.
Shen WD, Chen HL, Liu PF. EGFR gene copy number as a predictive biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer treatment: a meta-analysis. Chin J Cancer Res 2014; 26: 59-71.
 
9.
Shinto E, Hashiguchi Y, Ueno H, Kobayashi H, Ishiguro M, Mochizuki H, Yamamoto J, Hase K. Pretreatment CD 133 and cyclooxygenase-2 expression as the predictive markers of the pathological effect of chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 1098-106.
 
10.
Stremitzer S, Sebio A, Stintzing S, Lenz HJ. Panitumumab safety for treating colorectal cancer. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2014; 13: 843-51.
 
11.
Thomaidis T, Maderer A, Formentini A, Bauer S, Trautmann M, Schwarz M, Neumann W, Kittner J, Schad A, Link KH, Rey J, Weinmann A, Hoffman A, Galle P, Kornmann M, Moehler M. Proteins of the VEGFR and EGFR pathway as predictive markers for adjuvant treatment in patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer: results of the FOGT-4 trial. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2014; 33: 83.
 
eISSN:2300-6722
ISSN:1899-1874
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top