Introduction: The majority of contemporary studies suggest that there is almost unanimous satisfaction with and acceptance of orthodontic treatment among patients. In some studies pain is suggested as a predominant feature that influences patient’s perception of the treatment as a whole.
Aim of the research: To find predictors of pain and impairment of daily routines in patients currently undergoing orthodontic treatment.
Material and methods: The study was based on a self-created anonymous questionnaire with both close-ended and open questions. Patients from one dental practice were asked to fill out anonymous questionnaire on satisfaction with orthodontic treatment and its impact on their daily routines.
Results: There were altogether 148 questionnaires filled out by 108 (73%) women and 40 (27%) men. Mean age of patients was 25.8 ±6.4 (min.–max.: 18–44) years. The mean length of orthodontic treatment was 12.2 ±8.4 months (min.–max.: 1–36). Majority of patients (98%) were satisfied with their orthodontic treatment (grades 4 and 5). Pain was present mostly during application of braces (81%) and in half of patients during control visits (48%) and was never reported as a continuous feature. Younger patients (< 25 years of age) tended to feel pain more often when applying braces. Patients with longer treatment time (at least 12 months after applying braces) tended to report significantly (p < 0.05) less inconveniences caused by braces during eating than those with shorter treatment.
Conclusions: Majority of patients were satisfied with treatment. Orthodontists should pay attention to pain management during application of braces in younger patients and provide patients with adequate information on possible impairment of daily routines during the treatment.
REFERENCES(20)
1.
Chen YH, Liao YF, Chang CS, Lu TC, Chen KT. Patient satisfaction and quality of life after orthodontic treatment for cleft lip and palate deformity. Clin Oral Investig 2021; 25: 5521-5529.
Alhajj MN, Ariffin Z, Celebić A, Alkheraif AA, Amran AG, Ismail IA. Perception of orofacial appearance among laypersons with diverse social and demographic status. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0239232.
Yao J, Li DD, Yang YQ, McGrath CP, Mattheos N. What are patients’ expectations of orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health 2016; 16: 19.
Pachêco-Pereira C, Pereira JR, Dick BD, Perez A, Flores-Mir C. Factors associated with patient and parent satisfaction after orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 148: 652-659.
Lee R, Hwang S, Lim H, Cha JY, Kim KH, Chung CJ. Treatment satisfaction and its influencing factors among adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 153: 808-817.
Wong L, Ryan FS, Christensen LR, Cunningham SJ. Factors influencing satisfaction with the process of orthodontic treatment in adult patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 153: 362-370.
Azaripour A, Weusmann J, Mahmoodi B, Peppas D, Gerhold-Ay A, Van Noorden CJ, Willershausen B. Braces versus Invisalign®: gingival parameters and patients’ satisfaction during treatment: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health 2015; 15: 69.
Alajmi S, Shaban A, Al-Azemi R. Comparison of short-term oral impacts experienced by patients treated with invisalign or conventional fixed orthodontic appliances. Med Princ Pract 2020; 29: 382-388.
Ohkubo M, Ueda T, Miura K, Sugito H, Ono K, Seshima F, Morioka T, Uchiyama S, Yoshida M, Yajima Y. “Easy-to-eat meals” for outpatients following dental treatment. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2019; 60: 225-232.
Pacheco-Pereira C, Brandelli J, Flores-Mir C. Patient satisfaction and quality of life changes after Invisalign treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 153: 834-841.
Flores-Mir C, Brandelli J, Pacheco-Pereira C. Patient satisfaction and quality of life status after 2 treatment modalities: invisalign and conventional fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 154: 639-644.
Bialek KI, Sadowski M. The influence of selected factors on the degree of illness acceptance and on the level of satisfaction with life in patients hospitalised in cardiology departments. Medical Studies 2020; 36: 157-156.
Reszka K, Moskal Ł, Remiorz A et al. The prevalence of complementary and alternative methods and their impact on conventional cancer treatment among oncological patients in Poland – an institutional study. Medical Studies 2021; 37: 91-99.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.