Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
ORIGINAL PAPER
Prevalence of breast ptosis and related quality of life in women
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland
 
2
Student at Faculty of Psychology in Wroclaw, University of Business and Applied Sciences Varsovia, Poland
 
3
Department of Mathematical Statistics and Data Mining, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2025-10-25
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-02-06
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-07-15
 
 
Corresponding author
Marek Jankowski   

Nicolaus Copernicus University
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Although breast ptosis is assumed to be an indicator of ageing and plays important role in a woman’s attractiveness and body satisfaction, there is a paucity of epidemiological and quality-of-life data.

Aim of the research:
To provide epidemiologic benchmark for rejuvenation claims in breast aesthetic surgery.

Material and methods:
We examined the prevalence of breast ptosis and measured its impact on women’s quality of life by using the Rainbow score and BREST-Q questionnaire. A total of 605 volunteers participated in Study 1, and data from 1907 photomodels was analysed in Study 2.

Results:
Among women aged 18–22 years, clinically significant ptosis was present in 30% and 36% participants of Study 1 and Study 2, respectively. Severity of breast ptosis, but not age, was correlated with breast-related quality-of-life scores. Significant differences in all breast-related quality-of-life measures were found between non-ptotic, mildly ptotic, and severely ptotic respondents. The self-reported degree of ptosis influenced the difference in breast satisfaction when clothed or naked (H(4) = 70.926, p < 0.001). Women self-declaring an adolescent breast shape expressed significantly higher desired breast positioning than all other groups (p < 0.006). Women with ptotic breasts assumed a higher degree of breast ptosis in age-matched peers compared to women without breast ptosis (p < 0.001). Additionally, we found a tendency for underestimation of breast ptosis in younger age groups and a tendency for overestimation of breast ptosis in older age groups.

Conclusions:
Breast ptosis is a prevalent phenomenon in young adult women. One’s breast ptosis status has a negative impact on quality of life and biases one’s perception of age norms.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Furnham A, Swami V. Perception of female buttocks and breast size in profile. Soc Behav Personal Int J. 2007; 35: 1-8.
 
2.
Bovet J, Lao J, Bartholomée O, Caldara R, Raymond M. Mapping female bodily features of attractiveness. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 18551.
 
3.
Havlíček J, Třebický V, Varella Valentova J, Kleisner K, Mbe Akoko R, Fialová J, Jash R, Kočnar T, Pereira KJ, Štěrbová Z, Corrêa Varella MA, Vokurková J, Vunan E, Craig Roberts S. Men’s preferences for women’s breast size and shape in four cultures. Evolution Human Behav. 2017; 38: 217-226.
 
4.
Rinker B, Veneracion M, Walsh CP. Breast ptosis: causes and cure. Ann Plast Surg. 2010; 64: 579-584.
 
5.
Ibrahim AM, Sinno HH, Izadpanah A, Vorstenbosch J, Dionisopoulos T, Markarian MK, Lee BT, Lin SJ. Mastopexy for breast ptosis: utility outcomes of population preferences. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2015; 23: 103-107.
 
6.
Eyck BM, van Dongen JA, Athanassopoulos T, Bastos Martins J. The Rainbow Scale for assessing breast ptosis: validation of three different views. Aesthet Surg J. 2016; 36: 1010-1016.
 
7.
Kirwan L. A classification and algorithm for treatment of breast ptosis. Aesthet Surg J. 2002; 22: 355-363.
 
8.
Regnault P. Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg. 1976; 3: 193-203.
 
9.
Pusic AL, Klassen A, Scott A, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q©. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 345-353.
 
10.
Voracek M, Fisher ML. Success is all in the measures: androgenousness, curvaceousness, and starring frequencies in adult media actresses. Arch Sex Behav. 2006; 35: 297-304.
 
11.
R Core Team (2024). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
 
12.
Kono T, Kusan, T, Sato N, Yoshimoto S, Nakamura S. Natural mastopexy repositioning based on age-related mean breast shape. Asian J Surg. 2018; 41: 295-300.
 
13.
Huang NS, Quan CL, Mo M, Chen JJ, Yang BI, Huang XY, Wu J. A prospective study of breast anthropomorphic measurements, volume and ptosis in 605 Asian patients with breast cancer or benign breast disease. PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0172122.
 
14.
Groyecka A, Żelaźniewicz A, Misiak M, Karwowski M, Sorokowski P. Breast shape (ptosis) as a marker of a woman’s breast attractiveness and age: evidence from Poland and Papua. Am J Hum Biol. 2017; 29(4). doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22981.
 
15.
Kibadi AK, Kabongo F. Breast shape (ptosis) in young female students in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: influence of age, height, weight and wearing of the bra. Open Access Library J. 2023; 10: e10030.
 
16.
Coltman CE, Steele JR, McGhee DE. Effect of aging on breast skin thickness and elasticity: implications for breast support. Skin Res Technol. 2017; 23: 303-311.
 
17.
Frederick DA, Peplau A, Lever J. The Barbie mystique: satisfaction with breast size and shape across the lifespan. Int J Sexual Health. 2008; 20: 200-211.
 
18.
Lassek WD, Gaulin SJC. Does nubility indicate more than high reproductive value? Nubile primiparas’ pregnancy outcomes in evolutionary perspective. Evol Psychol. 2021; 19: 14747049211039506.
 
19.
Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL. Understanding the health burden of macromastia: normative data for the BREAST-Q reduction module. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 139: 846e-853e.
 
20.
Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL. Normative data for interpreting the BREAST-Q: augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 139: 846-853.
 
21.
Holsen I, Carlson Jones D, Skogbrott Birkeland M. Body image satisfaction among Norwegian adolescents and young adults: a longitudinal study of the influence of interpersonal relationships and BMI. Body Image. 2012; 9: 201-208.
 
22.
Tovée MJ, Emery JL, Cohen-Tovée EM. The estimation of body mass index and physical attractiveness is dependent on the observer’s own body mass index. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 267: 1987-1997.
 
eISSN:2300-6722
ISSN:1899-1874
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top